United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio has stated Washington “strongly rejects” French President Emmanuel Macron’s plan to recognise a Palestinian state, because the administration of President Donald Trump introduced it might not attend an upcoming United Nations convention in search of a two-state answer for Palestinians.
Posting on X late on Thursday, Rubio criticised Macron’s “reckless choice”, which he stated “solely serves Hamas propaganda and units again peace”.
Earlier, Macron had stated he would formalise France’s choice to formally recognise a Palestinian state on the UN’s Basic Meeting in September.
“In line with its historic dedication to a simply and lasting peace within the Center East, I’ve determined that France will recognise the State of Palestine,” Macron wrote on X.
No less than 142 international locations out of the 193 members of the UN at the moment recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state. However a number of highly effective Western international locations – together with the US, the UK and Germany – have refused to take action.
Fellow European Union members Norway, Eire and Spain indicated in May that that they had begun the method to recognise a Palestinian state.
However Macron’s choice would make France – certainly one of Israel’s closest allies and a G7 member – the biggest and arguably most influential nation in Europe to make the transfer.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the choice, saying such a transfer “rewards terror and dangers creating one other Iranian proxy”.
“A Palestinian state in these situations could be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – to not dwell in peace beside it,” he stated in a submit on X.
“Let’s be clear: the Palestinians don’t search a state alongside Israel; they search a state as a substitute of Israel,” Netanyahu added.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz additionally described the transfer as “a shame and a give up to terrorism”. He added that Israel wouldn’t enable the institution of a “Palestinian entity that might hurt our safety, endanger our existence”.
Whereas supporting a two-state answer stays the long-held official stance of the US, President Donald Trump has himself expressed doubts about its viability. Since returning to the White Home in January, Trump advised the US might “take over” Gaza, displace the territory’s greater than two million Palestinian inhabitants, and remodel it into the “Riviera of the Middle East”.
Trump’s plan has been condemned by rights teams, Arab states, Palestinians and the UN as tantamount to “ethnic cleaning”.
In June, Washington’s ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, additionally stated he didn’t assume an unbiased Palestinian state remained a US overseas coverage aim.
His feedback prompted Division of State spokesperson Tammy Bruce to say Huckabee “speaks for himself” and policy-making is a matter for Trump and the White Home.
On Thursday, State Division deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott stated the US won’t attend an upcoming convention set to be held on the UN on the two-state answer. The convention – co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, and scheduled to happen between July 28-30 – seeks to chart a roadmap to finish the decades-long battle and recognise a Palestinian state.
Talking to reporters, Pigott stated there was “nothing additional” to say in regards to the situation apart from that Washington “won’t be in attendance”.
There’s mounting strain on Israel to finish its lethal conflict on Gaza, waged within the wake of the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, assaults on southern Israel, which noticed some 1,139 folks killed and greater than 200 captives taken to the Palestinian enclave.
Israel’s subsequent 21-month assault on Gaza has resulted in nearly 60,000 Palestinians being killed, with an additional 144,000 wounded.
Months-long ceasefire negotiations – brokered by the US, Egypt and Qatar – have thus far did not yield a breakthrough.
On Monday, 28 international locations – together with the UK, Japan and quite a few European nations – issued a joint statement telling Israel the conflict on Gaza “should finish now”.
The joint assertion additionally condemned “the drip feeding of help and the inhumane killing of civilians, together with youngsters, in search of to fulfill their most elementary wants of water and meals”.