TPUSA spokesperson and longtime govt director for The Charlie Kirk Present, Andrew Kolvet, has set the report straight on the dearth of an exit wound in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Because the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, dozens of rumors have surfaced on-line questioning the FBI’s experiences that Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter within the Charlie Kirk assassination by citing the dearth of an exit wound.
The rumors took off after conservative commentator Candace Owens claimed she considered the footage of the assassination from behind, and it didn’t present an exit wound from the again.
WATCH:
BREAKING: Candace Owens has now considered footage from the lacking digital camera that was BEHIND Charlie Kirk.
She says the video exhibits no blood and NO signal of an exit wound.
This might DEBUNK the official narrative of a rifle shot from in entrance.
pic.twitter.com/jglX2JtScF— ADAM (@AdameMedia) September 20, 2025
Kolvet has poured chilly water on the “exit wound” idea and has addressed it straight on.
Kolvet, in a submit on X, wrote, “I’m normally not desirous about delving into most of this type of on-line chatter, and I apologize that is considerably graphic, however on this case, the truth that there wasn’t an exit wound might be one other miracle, and I need individuals to know.”
He continued, “I simply spoke with the surgeon who labored on Charlie within the hospital. He mentioned the bullet ‘completely ought to have gone by way of, which may be very very regular for a excessive powered, excessive velocity spherical. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many instances and so they all the time simply undergo the whole lot. This might have taken a moose or two down, an elk, and many others.’”
The physician continued to share with Kolvet, “It was an absolute miracle that another person didn’t get killed. His bone was so wholesome and the density was so so spectacular that he’s like the person of metal.”
LOOK:
I wish to tackle a number of the dialogue concerning the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m normally not desirous about delving into most of this type of on-line chatter, and I apologize that is considerably graphic, however on this case, the truth that there wasn’t an exit wound might be…
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025
Full submit from Andrew Kolvet:
I wish to tackle a number of the dialogue concerning the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m normally not desirous about delving into most of this type of on-line chatter, and I apologize that is considerably graphic, however on this case, the truth that there wasn’t an exit wound might be one other miracle, and I need individuals to know.
I simply spoke with the surgeon who labored on Charlie within the hospital…
He mentioned the bullet “completely ought to have gone by way of, which may be very very regular for a excessive powered, excessive velocity spherical. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many instances and so they all the time simply undergo the whole lot. This might have taken a moose or two down, an elk, and many others.”
However it didn’t undergo. Charlie’s physique stopped it.
I discussed to his physician that there have been dozens of employees, college students, and particular visitors standing immediately behind Charlie on the opposite facet of the tent, and he replied:
“It was an absolute miracle that another person didn’t get killed.”
“His bone was so wholesome and the density was so so spectacular that he’s like the person of metal. It ought to have simply gone by way of and thru. It seemingly would have killed these standing behind him too.”
In the long run, the coroner did discover the bullet simply beneath the pores and skin.
Even in demise, Charlie managed to save lots of the lives of these round him.
Exceptional. Miraculous.
Kolvet has additionally addressed the SD playing cards being faraway from cameras on the scene of the assassination.
READ:
