Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel lately met with New York Occasions columnist Ross Douthat to debate many matters, together with innovation, life extension know-how, the antichrist, and transhumanism.
The subject of transhumanism was introduced up when Douthat requested Thiel, “Ought to the human race survive?”
Thiel responded, “Sure. However I additionally would really like us to radically resolve these issues. And so it’s all the time, I don’t know, yeah — transhumanism.”
The co-founder of Palantir added, “The perfect was this radical transformation the place your human, pure physique will get reworked into an immortal physique.”
He later said that transgenderism doesn’t go far sufficient relating to altering one’s physique and shared, “We wish greater than cross-dressing or altering your intercourse organs. We wish you to have the ability to change your coronary heart and alter your thoughts and alter your entire physique.”
WATCH:
I fully agree with Thiel. In fact we wish to enhance ourselves. In fact we wish to obtain mastery over our flesh. In fact we wish to advance thus far that in the future we would not be recognizable as human. pic.twitter.com/wvcLUihlIs
— Hunter Ash (@ArtemisConsort) June 29, 2025
In case you’re unfamiliar with transhumanism, it’s an ideology that promotes utilizing know-how and science to reinforce human capabilities.
Basically, transhumanists welcome an period the place people merge with machines.
Later within the interview, Thiel and Douthat talk about the antichrist.
Thiel shared that “The best way the Antichrist would take over the world is you speak about Armageddon nonstop. You speak about existential threat nonstop, and that is what it is advisable regulate.”
The New York Times supplied a transcript:
Douthat: You might have been giving talks lately concerning the idea of the Antichrist, which is a Christian idea, an apocalyptic idea. What does that imply to you? What’s the Antichrist?
Thiel: All proper. Properly, I may speak about it for a very long time. I believe there’s all the time a query of how we articulate a few of these existential dangers, a number of the challenges now we have, and so they’re all framed on this type of runaway dystopian science textual content. There’s a threat of nuclear conflict, there’s a threat of environmental catastrophe. Perhaps one thing particular, like local weather change, though there are many different ones we’ve give you. There’s a threat of bioweapons. You might have all of the totally different sci-fi eventualities. Clearly, there are specific varieties of dangers with A.I.
Thiel: However I all the time suppose that if we’re going to have this body of speaking about existential dangers, maybe we must also discuss concerning the threat of one other kind of a foul singularity, which I might describe because the one-world totalitarian state. As a result of I might say the default political answer individuals have for all these existential dangers is one-world governance. What do you do about nuclear weapons? Now we have a United Nations with actual enamel that controls them, and so they’re managed by a global political order. After which one thing like that is additionally: What can we do about A.I.? And we’d like international compute governance. We’d like a one-world authorities to regulate all of the computer systems, log each single keystroke, to verify individuals don’t program a harmful A.I. And I’ve been questioning whether or not that’s going from the frying pan into the fireplace.
Thiel: The atheist philosophical framing is “One World or None.” That was a brief movie that was put out by the Federation of American Scientists within the late ’40s. It begins with the nuclear bomb blowing up the world, and clearly, you want a one-world authorities to cease it — one world or none. And the Christian framing, which in some methods is identical query, is: Antichrist or Armageddon? You might have the one-world state of the Antichrist, or we’re sleepwalking towards Armageddon. “One world or none,” “Antichrist or Armageddon,” on one stage, are the identical query.
Thiel: It’s a really implausible plot gap. However I believe now we have a solution to this plot gap. The best way the Antichrist would take over the world is you speak about Armageddon nonstop. You speak about existential threat nonstop, and that is what it is advisable regulate. It’s the other of the image of Baconian science from the seventeenth, 18th century, the place the Antichrist is like some evil tech genius, evil scientist who invents this machine to take over the world. Individuals are means too scared for that.
Thiel: In our world, the factor that has political resonance is the other. The factor that has political resonance is: We have to cease science, we have to simply say “cease” to this. And that is the place, within the seventeenth century, I can think about a Dr. Strangelove, Edward Teller-type individual taking up the world. In our world, it’s way more prone to be Greta Thunberg.
WATCH:
Peter Thiel is requested why he’s not the Antichrist he warns about if he’s actively constructing authoritarian rule by way of army and surveillance applied sciences
“These are totally different eventualities…clearly I don’t suppose that that’s what I’m doing” pic.twitter.com/cDEdAW1Eqs
— HOT SPOT (@HotSpotHotSpot) June 27, 2025
You may watch the whole interview under:
