California is the site of a series of interlocking problems: It’s just too expensive for many people. There aren’t enough homes, or at least enough affordable ones. The insurance market is a challenge. Homelessness is difficult. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is splitting up families. Federal cuts to universities and health care are rampant. Gasoline and electricity are expensive. Water rights are complicated. Fires and floods and the effects of climate change are already savage. The state is also home to the biggest economic story of our age, artificial intelligence, and remains one of the most beautiful places in the country, where millions want to live.
Whom should voters choose to deal with all of this? The California governor’s race has been chaotic and confusing. Democratic candidates are offering up their party’s full range of choices, from technocratic moderates to progressive populists.
Times Opinion assembled a panel of experts with a range of viewpoints for a new installment of The Choice, aimed at guiding voters — and in California, especially Democratic voters — through the complex issues in this election.
The Choice was prepared by Times Opinion editors, based in part on a round-table conversation with the panelists held on April 24 and a survey from which Times Opinion averaged the panelists’ responses.
Our Panel’s Ratings
We asked panelists to rate the leading candidates on how they would approach governing. Each chart reflects an average of their individual ratings.
Times Opinion
What do you think about the overall slate of candidates and the situation for Democrats right now?
Angie Wei California consultant
It’s been probably the most fascinating factor that I’ve watched in my time in California politics. The sector being so huge and so huge makes it exhausting. There’s quite a lot of noise within the marketing campaign — makes it exhausting for voters to concentrate on points. So we’re actually not making selections on insurance policies.
Dan Morain California politics journalist
We haven’t had a marketing campaign like this in actually a very long time in California. This one remains to be so fluid. The problems appear to matter rather a lot much less. However the points are so big. What’s the subsequent governor going to do with high-speed rail? What’s the subsequent governor going to do concerning the psychological well being care system?
Addisu Demissie Former campaign manager for Gavin Newsom
We now have high quality candidates, even good candidates. However I’ve talked with individuals who’ve labored on these campaigns this yr, and simply from my very own expertise in California politics, no one began the marketing campaign with a statewide profile, particularly something approaching the final three governors: Newsom, Jerry Brown, Arnold Schwarzenegger. One of many causes the election has largely not been about coverage variations is as a result of everyone seems to be simply struggling to have folks know who they’re. Typically in campaigns in California, that’s a operate of cash. However Steyer hasn’t pulled away, regardless of spending more than $130 million as of this recording. I believe we’re going to have a fairly fluid race proper up till the top.
Tracy Hernandez Civic leader from Los Angeles
I truly discover it fairly thrilling. As somebody who needs to activate voters, the truth that the result just isn’t preset and predetermined, not like many statewide California races, I discover that to be fairly stimulating.
Dan Schnur Political communications professor in Los Angeles
I believe voters are starting to get some readability: If the state needs to maneuver additional left, then Steyer and Porter are offering that choice. If the state needs to maneuver to the middle, that’s the place Matt Mahan and Villaraigosa are available in. If the state needs to maneuver far proper, then Hilton or Bianco are the reply. And for individuals who need to keep precisely the place we’re, Becerra has emerged because the most secure and most comforting various.
Times Opinion
A lot of these candidates — Porter, Steyer, Mahan, the Republicans, Eric Swalwell before he dropped out — don’t have much experience in Sacramento. They haven’t served statewide. Is that a problem or a worry? Could it be an advantage? California has a lot of challenges.
Mariel Garza Opinion journalist in Los Angeles
It’s notable that up till a couple of weeks in the past, till Swalwell’s sexual misconduct scandal, after which he exited the race, that he on the Democratic aspect and Steve Hilton on the Republican aspect have been the main candidates for his or her events. These are individuals who, in case you rank all of the candidates by way of expertise, they arrive down close to the underside. However what they’d that different folks didn’t have is a sure celeb. They have been common speaking heads on Fox Information and MS NOW. It’s not like Hollywood celeb, however it’s political celeb. And that’s, I believe, why they have been on the prime. If expertise mattered to voters, you then would have had the individuals who ran state businesses — Betty Yee, Tony Thurmond — on the prime from the start.
Tracy Hernandez Civic leader from Los Angeles
I do assume that in case you’re a member of Congress or a member of the Legislature, you’re certainly one of a zillion. That’s a unique form of expertise than precise, literal energy brokering or accountability, like once you’ve been a C.E.O., you’ve been a mayor. The buck stops with you, which is approach completely different.
Dan Morain California politics journalist
Nicely, a candidate who has vital expertise is Villaraigosa. He was speaker, was mayor of L.A. It’s an enormous job. He’s struggling at low single digits. I imply, perhaps 5 p.c.
Angie Wei California consultant
Being an govt is such a unique job than being even within the Legislature, or a speaking head. California’s an enormous state. We’ve received huge challenges. We as voters ought to demand extra. I assumed, for instance, we must always run situations and make these candidates react to one of many crises that’s very actual in California: A wildfire begins and is spreading. What are the primary 5 issues that you just’re going to do? A world pandemic is starting. What are the primary 5 issues that you just’re going to do? Take a look at these candidates. We have to push for that, as a result of I can’t let you know how any of them are going to react in a world disaster that’s very prone to hit us within the subsequent 4 or eight years.
Times Opinion
Democrats talk about how central Gov. Gavin Newsom is. People have often praised Jerry Brown’s directness with people about problems. Are there any of these candidates that you’ve seen who could have either of those qualities?
Dan Morain California politics journalist
I do assume that Villaraigosa might be a forceful governor. I additionally assume Steyer might be. And definitely, Porter can be forceful. So they’d be a presence, undoubtedly, as would Hilton.
Sara Sadhwani Politics professor in Los Angeles
I believe Steyer and Villaraigosa aren’t within the likeness of Jerry Brown, however they’re prepared to be a bit bit extra simple about what the problems are and the way they’d sort out them. With most of the others, there’s a return to their fundamental speaking factors, their stump speech; that doesn’t get voters very far as soon as they begin to attempt to pull again these layers. My sense is that a part of the enchantment of Steyer is that straight-talk nature he has, or a minimum of a way of his being prepared to tackle points and never being fettered by the Democratic Get together or by the pursuits that maybe maintain different candidates again.
Times Opinion
Voting is underway. Can you offer a quick description of a strength and a weakness for a few of the candidates? Let’s start with Xavier Becerra.
Dan Morain California politics journalist
Becerra’s energy is he is aware of the state. His weak point is he’s overly cautious.
Angie Wei California consultant
Becerra has some expertise and a few relationships in authorities — that’s a energy. To this point, he’s not answering some questions clearly or persistently. That may create actual issues; hopefully, that can even out with extra publicity beneath the intense lights.
Mariel Garza Opinion journalist in Los Angeles
He’s not one to take political dangers, which is why he typically solutions troublesome questions with some model of “I’ll have a look at that.” His energy is that he understands and respects the construction and performance of presidency.
Times Opinion
How about Tom Steyer?
Angie Wei California consultant
His energy is he’s much less beholden to pursuits and will be daring. However he doesn’t have any public sector expertise — no expertise in governing, in negotiating with the Legislature and stakeholders, in touchdown a balanced funds, in responding to sudden crises.
Dan Morain California politics journalist
He’d be a disrupter. That’s a energy. His weak point is he has made too many guarantees to too many curiosity teams.
Dan Schnur Political communications professor in Los Angeles
Both Steyer or Hilton would disrupt Sacramento in a approach that hasn’t occurred for the reason that invention of the web. Hilton may pull state authorities additional to the correct than Steyer would to the left, however simply barely.
Times Opinion
Yes, let’s talk a little about Steve Hilton, too. He’s likely to make the runoff. What would be a strength and a weakness of his?
Mariel Garza Opinion journalist in Los Angeles
Hilton’s energy is his accent — that’s solely partly a joke. However that, and his infectious optimism about California, undoubtedly jogs my memory of one other accented immigrant Republican who ran for governor in a crowded, chaotic race, and who received folks enthusiastic about authorities. He seems to have the identical weak point that plagued Governor Schwarzenegger throughout his first time period: the misguided perception he might accomplish huge issues with out the Democratic Legislature.
Dan Morain California politics journalist
His energy is he’d get together with Trump. His weak point is he’d get together with Trump.
Times Opinion
What about a strength and a weakness for a candidate we haven’t talked about?
Angie Wei California consultant
Porter’s energy is that she’s probably the most policy-specific and sensible on what can truly get carried out. She might be a critical govt. A weak point is that she appears to make some dangerous decisions. She may need issues by way of how she negotiates and builds relationships.
Mariel Garza Opinion journalist in Los Angeles
Villaraigosa’s energy is that he has run a authorities simply as difficult and financially unstable because the State of California — and did it fairly properly, by most accounts. His weak point is that he’s been away from authorities service for a very long time and doesn’t have the alliances he used to have, or maintain the identical political capital.
Times Opinion
Governor Newsom and the Legislature have done a lot to change the politics around housing, and they’ve made a lot of changes on policy, especially regulatory and environmental reform. Many of the candidates are talking about continuing some of those policies, like pushing cities to build more, as Newsom has done, or pursuing modular housing.
Would any of these candidates be notably effective at building more housing?
Kara Murray Badal Housing expert from Oakland
I don’t assume we get to understand how succesful the candidates are till they’re truly within the seat. However we do perceive what the necessity is in California, proper? Constructing more than 70,000 affordable units yearly in an effort to sustain with the demand that exists within the state.
This is a problem that if we don’t address it, the state will continue to crumble. We understand that a governor is probably not going to understand all of the nuances of every portion of housing, but a readiness to be innovative in the space, to lean on expertise and to iterate when we find things out. We’ve passed more than 100 pieces of housing legislation at this point, and we’re still figuring out what is working and what’s not working. Being willing to uptake the new information as it comes and iterate is the essential part for me.
Tracy Hernandez Civic leader from Los Angeles
What is de facto completely different is individuals are up for a actuality verify. We’ve been very aspirational for the final couple of many years, and issues are simply not working. Individuals are saying, I can’t lease a house. I’ve no hope to purchase a house. None of our children that graduate from school are staying right here. They’re going.
Mariel Garza Opinion journalist in Los Angeles
Lots of what the candidates are speaking about is eliminating allowing or streamlining allowing or eliminating rules, although it’s not clear which of them. However one of many issues is that what a governor can do about housing is de facto restricted, as a result of a lot of the housing selections occur on the native degree. We did see a fairly vital invoice that might change that round transit hubs. And it was fought, tooth and nail, by quite a lot of cities, together with my very own, as a result of cities prefer to determine the place housing can occur. However by way of simply getting homes constructed, that’s a troublesome one.
Kara Murray Badal Housing expert from Oakland
There are issues {that a} governor can work on, like resolving fragmentation within the constructing code or eager about monetary danger and legal responsibility to encourage business progress. Particularly, the governor is necessary to the implementation of the California Housing and Homelessness Company, which is that this nascent housing company that can go into impact this yr and can want a cupboard official to run it. The creation and implementation of that new company might be actually important for the subsequent governor.
Addisu Demissie Former campaign manager for Gavin Newsom
Housing was the No. 1 challenge within the marketing campaign I ran for Governor Newsom in 2017 and ’18. Then the pandemic occurred. I don’t know the coverage round housing in addition to some others right here, however for a governor, it’s principally a problem of prioritization and braveness. The issue has persevered, however it’s not essentially as a result of we lack good coverage. We now have some nice insurance policies. Reforming the California Environmental High quality Act was a 3rd rail in 2017 and ’18, and we have now since carried out it. However in the end, one of many huge questions we have now to ask is: Is the subsequent governor going to make it their No. 1 precedence? And can they tackle the pursuits that need to decelerate progress?
Tracy Hernandez Civic leader from Los Angeles
I imply, Mahan’s the one one that may show it. He has the expertise of what it takes to construct in a metropolis at this time, not 20 years in the past.
Dan Schnur Political communications professor in Los Angeles
As mayors, Mahan and Villaraigosa are the 2 candidates finest certified to tackle the problem of state and native cooperation.
Kara Murray Badal Housing expert from Oakland
Total, speaking about strengths, housing coverage is Porter’s bread and butter. She will be able to maintain her personal with any specialist and embraces skilled analysis on easy methods to clear up the housing disaster. Mahan brings the manager readability of a mayor who centered his time period on housing. His document in San Jose leaves little doubt the place he stands. I believe there’s a rising fluency that Steyer and Becerra have, which underscores how fluency in housing coverage is now the worth of entry in California. Their housing insurance policies are an extension of their bigger ideologies, and the true check on execution can be the groups they construct.
Times Opinion
On homelessness, likewise, Newsom has instituted a number of new programs or policies, such as CARE Court, the program that was initially intended to allow families to compel people into treatment. They have been slow to start.
Should the next governor keep with the direction that Newsom has taken? Should he or she change course?
Angie Wei California consultant
Each new governor needs to return in and hit their very own dwelling run, when in reality, authorities is a slow-moving beast. It takes time for applications to get carried out and for achievement and analysis to occur.
Dan Morain California politics journalist
Newsom has carried out one thing that no different governor has carried out, which is to concentrate on this challenge and direct billions of {dollars} towards it, in methods which are seen and never seen. However it’s going to take a couple of time period or two phrases of any governor to show it round. It’s a decades-long downside, and it’s not going to get mounted in a single day.
California is going to be facing a really tough budget in 2027. The next governor is going to have to confront all these Medicaid cuts. We spend more on health care than many states spend on their entire budgets. The next governor really is going to have a tough time handling health care, which I don’t know that any candidate is particularly addressing. But if you start pulling federal money out of the system, what we see on the streets now and in prisons now won’t get better.
Tracy Hernandez Civic leader from Los Angeles
Newsom made some actual headway, and the voters supported it. However the huge challenge is: The place’s the funding, the backup, the follow-through? All the pieces in California is about execution, about audit, transparency and follow-through. The concept is we by no means have a scarcity of sensible concepts. It’s execution.
Kara Murray Badal Housing expert from Oakland
Homelessness can also be a housing challenge. It’s a provide challenge, as a result of there’s not sufficient housing, as a result of rents are going up. I’ve heard a number of the candidates speaking about that reality — that retaining folks in housing is equally necessary.
Times Opinion
California has set really ambitious climate goals. The state also struggles with high gas and electricity prices, for a variety of reasons. Some of the candidates — like Villaraigosa and Mahan — have talked about easing refinery regulation or dialing back the gas tax.
Who in the field is likely to continue with California’s climate goals, and who is likely to perhaps dial them back?
Addisu Demissie Former campaign manager for Gavin Newsom
Fuel costs are the highest concern of parents over and above anything, due to the Iran struggle. The price of residing has been the highest challenge for years. To the extent that local weather is perceived to extend the underside line for voters who’re struggling everyday, it will likely be deprioritized. I additionally assume that’s a false selection, typically. And definitely, the vast majority of the voters is acutely aware of the setting.
Kara Murray Badal Housing expert from Oakland
One of the best factor that we are able to do is densify in locations that have already got infrastructure, proper? That brings down the price of transportation and transportation air pollution, which is likely one of the major drivers of local weather points. It additionally hopefully places folks nearer to transit, places folks nearer to their jobs, places folks onto infrastructure that’s already constructed, hopefully constructing in locations which are established and secure. So in that approach, there’s true alignment and chance with the local weather targets.
Tracy Hernandez Civic leader from Los Angeles
We’re happy with having the hardest, cleanest targets on local weather and water cleanliness and use, and being the very best we will be. However what’s completely different proper now could be the urge for food and demand for all of the above. Now, individuals are saying: We would like the targets, however let’s perhaps put them on a timeline that retains up with expertise, the transition that doesn’t blow up prices.
Times Opinion
Steyer is an ardent climate activist, but he wants to build more homes. He says he can bring environmentalists along with him in this. Does that seem achievable?
Mariel Garza Opinion journalist in Los Angeles
When you construct housing in cities round transit corridors, that’s precisely what environmentalists are in search of. From my perspective, it’s in all probability the neatest solution to construct.
But I was reflecting on Hilton, who is the leading candidate in polling across the board. Obviously, there’s a lot of weird dynamics going on there. But he’s the only one who’s saying: “I’m going to get rid of all the environmental regulations. We’re going to build single-family homes everywhere, as opposed to densification. Today, we’re going to start oil production. We’re going to fire up our peaker plants that burn coal and forget the clean energy, basically.” And it’ll be really interesting to see how he does. I suspect he’s going to get more than just a small group of Republicans supporting him, because there are people who are like: “You know what, we’ve done all these environmental things. The air looks fine to me. Let’s do something for me now.”
Sara Sadhwani Politics professor in Los Angeles
There’s a dimension right here that we’re lacking. For younger folks, this isn’t a selection. They’ve grown up with excessive warmth. They’ve grown up with wildfires. Hilton and Bianco have stated we’re going again to drilling. We’re going to convey extra oil into California. We’re going to extract oil in California. However that’s not, I believe, what youthful voters are on the lookout for, and I don’t even assume it’s a lot of a selection, whether or not on the left or proper, for youthful voters.
Dan Schnur Political communications professor in Los Angeles
My college students have a look at the Iran struggle as a local weather change challenge. They perceive that with the Strait of Hormuz closing, China’s emergence and this nation’s lack of preparation to offer various power infrastructure are a basic risk. Whereas many citizens have deprioritized local weather and environmental coverage as a part of the broader affordability debate, younger folks, who know that they won’t personal a house for many years, if ever, at the moment are much more fervent of their concentrate on local weather. The nice irony is that Donald Trump will be the American politician who re-triggers local weather change as a top-tier challenge for Gen Z.
Times Opinion
If California’s budget challenges continue, based on how the candidates have campaigned, who would be more likely to cut spending or raise taxes, or fall somewhere in between?
Times Opinion
Let’s talk about the wealth tax, the proposed one-time 5 percent tax on people with more than $1 billion in assets. It will likely be on the ballot this fall. Primarily, the proceeds would offset the Medicaid reductions that Congress put into place. Almost the entire field opposes it. If it makes the ballot, do you think it will pass, and should it?
Angie Wei California consultant
Addressing revenue inequality and the wealth hole is completely what we must be doing. However I believe folks acknowledge {that a} one-time tax improve just isn’t an answer to our structural challenges in California. It could truly trigger extra issues than it solves. What does one-time cash do for us? The opposite piece of that is it’s fairly clear that that is going to be litigated. So can we truly cling our hopes and desires of protecting folks lined beneath Medi-Cal and different well being care applications on one thing that the courts are going to tie up?
Addisu Demissie Former campaign manager for Gavin Newsom
I imply, the reply isn’t any; it’s dangerous coverage. And no, it in all probability isn’t going to cross. However I perceive why it’s widespread, particularly in a major second, as a result of billionaires are very unpopular. If Steyer doesn’t win, one of many causes is perhaps as a result of regardless of being a populist billionaire, the billionaire a part of that may outweigh the populist a part of that.
Times Opinion
Artificial intelligence is the biggest story in the economy. People are worried about A.I. taking jobs and pushing back against data centers. At the same time, Big Tech’s success is part of the California story and helps power the state budget.
Who would be more likely to leave the A.I. industry alone and who would be more like to try to regulate A.I.?
Times Opinion
Should California be more worried about an A.I. bubble that pops and causes real problems for the budget? Or should California be more worried about A.I. taking a lot of jobs away?
Dan Morain California politics journalist
Sure to each.
Addisu Demissie Former campaign manager for Gavin Newsom
I agree. Wherever they’re on the political spectrum, voters are fairly uniformly in the identical place right here, which is: I perceive the promise, however I’m terrified that it’s going to remove my job, my business. I need authorities to do one thing about it.
Now, is that the state government of California or the federal government? It’s likely a federal issue. But we are the home of the industry, and I think that’s the fundamental reason why it’s probably not being debated in the governor’s race as much as it perhaps should be. By the time we get to the general election, it might be a bigger issue, and certainly by the time we get to 2028. We’re in a hockey stick situation on this issue. As we all know in our own industries and in our own lives, it has gone from, oh, this is a cute thing, to something we all use daily. But it’s coming. And certainly, the next governor is going to have to deal with it.
Angie Wei California consultant
The influence of A.I. on jobs goes to be an even bigger influence on our state funds over time than anything, rather more so than an A.I. bubble. I’m so glad that I’m on the finish of my profession and never firstly, as a result of we must be anxious concerning the jobs and the job high quality within the years to return.
Times Opinion
Navigating the relationship with President Trump is a major issue of governance now. Newsom has been quite combative, of course, during Trump’s second term. On the other end of the spectrum you have somebody like Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, who’s negotiated a bit, and then Republicans, who have mostly just cooperated.
Who in this field would be more likely to always oppose Trump? Who would be more likely to negotiate with him or even work with him?
Sara Sadhwani Politics professor in Los Angeles
It’s a difficult matter, as a result of the State of California — any state, fairly frankly — has so many points that they interface with the federal authorities on. So if we take it from the immigration standpoint, California will almost definitely take a confrontational strategy to the Trump administration, as a result of we’re dwelling to so many immigrants, and the ICE raids have hit us in such drastic methods. That stated, we’ve simply spent the final hour or so speaking about the true dire financial straits of the State of California. In that regard, the governor of California can’t take such a confrontational strategy. There needs to be a degree of pragmatism in an effort to make it possible for we’re capable of pull down as many {dollars} from the federal authorities as attainable.
Tom K. Wong Political science professor in San Diego
California has led, since Trump gained, in terms of pushing again in opposition to Trump-style immigration insurance policies, from defending DACA to defending our sanctuary state regulation to now making an attempt to unmask ICE. So we’re among the many most outstanding plaintiffs throughout immigration-related circumstances. Though immigration just isn’t one of many front-burner points for voters, it very properly might be if L.A. is focused once more, if there’s a Minneapolis-style enforcement that occurs in California. Due to our giant foreign-born inhabitants, as a result of one in five of our kids in California dwell in mixed-status households, immigration can catapult at any second to a front-burner challenge, which is why the expectation is that our management, particularly a Democratic governor, can be aggressive and battle again.
Kara Murray Badal Housing expert from Oakland
That is extra from my organizer perspective: I actually don’t need our unifying cries to be on the backs of our neighbors, however the means to rally folks round a problem is de facto necessary. I believe it’s much less of a, “Do I need my governor to battle again?” However it’s like, I need my governor to assist me really feel secure inside my state. If that can be utilized to catalyze that form of power, it might be actually highly effective for the candidate or for the subsequent governor.
Times Opinion
Immigration is a core conflict with the administration. Are there things that the next governor should be doing differently on immigration? The Legislature has tried different things, like mask bans for ICE.
Tom K. Wong Political science professor in San Diego
California and blue states and cities throughout the nation try to determine methods to restrict immigration enforcement to the extent that we have now seen in Chicago, Minneapolis and elsewhere.
Among litigation and other legislative approaches, one thing that is unique to California worth mentioning is that we have budget lines for immigrant inclusion and defense of immigrants in detention and in deportation proceedings. I know that in this conversation we’ve talked about the budget being an issue. We have more than $100 million that we spend in California on legal defense, as well as to support nonprofits that work to include and incorporate undocumented immigrants and other immigrants in their communities. Out of our budget, that is a fraction of a percent. A next governor, those on the left of the spectrum, the Porters, the Steyers, the Becerras, if they get the seat, will be pushed to expand that support, given it is such a small fraction of the budget.
About our panel The nine panelists assessed the candidates independently, not on behalf of their organizations.
Addisu Demissie is a political consultant who has led campaigns for national, state and local candidates. He managed Gov. Gavin Newsom’s campaign for governor in 2018 and Senator Cory Booker’s 2020 presidential run. He also worked on Katie Porter’s 2024 primary campaign for Senate.
Mariel Garza is a founder and the executive editor of Golden State, an independent commentary and news analysis publication that focuses on California. She was editorials editor for The Los Angeles Times. She lives in Los Angeles.
Tracy Hernandez is a founder and the chief executive of the New California Coalition, a nonpartisan civic group focused on economic growth. She founded and led BizFed, a business advocacy alliance, and was the publisher of The Los Angeles Daily News.
Dan Morain is a former editorial page editor of The Sacramento Bee and was a reporter for The Los Angeles Times for 27 years, focused on public policy and politics. His book about the mental health care system is forthcoming.
Kara Murray Badal directs the Housing Venture Lab at Terner Labs, an independent nonprofit founded by experts at U.C. Berkeley’s Terner Center for Housing Innovation. She has consulted city governments on policy. She ran in a special election for Oakland City Council in 2025 and is an Oakland native.
Sara Sadhwani teaches California politics and American government at Pomona College, where she conducts research on Asian American and Latino voting behavior and public opinion. She serves on the California Citizens Redistricting Commission and the Governance Reform Task Force of Los Angeles County.
Dan Schnur teaches political communications at the University of California, Berkeley, Pepperdine University and the University of Southern California. He has worked on four Republican presidential campaigns and three campaigns for governor. He is now a registered independent.
Angie Wei was chief lobbyist then chief of staff at the California Labor Federation from 2000 to 2018 and later served as Gov. Gavin Newsom’s legislative secretary. She consults for organizations and companies, focusing on government relations, state politics and working-class issues.
Tom K. Wong teaches politics at the University of California, San Diego, where he founded the school’s U.S. Immigration Policy Center. He served on the California Complete Count Committee under Gov. Jerry Brown. He was a candidate for the U.S. House in 2020.
