On this episode of “The Opinions,” Patrick Healy and David Leonhardt talk about President Trump’s makes an attempt to remake greater schooling and argue that greater schooling ought to reform itself first.
Under is a transcript of an episode of “The Opinions.” We advocate listening to it in its unique kind for the total impact. You are able to do so utilizing the participant above or on the NYT Audio app, Apple, Spotify, Amazon Music, YouTube, iHeartRadio or wherever you get your podcasts. The transcript has been flippantly edited for size and readability.
Patrick Healy: I’m Patrick Healy, deputy editor of New York Occasions Opinion, and that is The First 100 Days, a weekly sequence inspecting President Trump’s use of energy and his drive to vary America. A extremely essential option to perceive Trump’s strategy to energy is thru the domino idea. Trump makes an instance out of 1 individual or establishment to ship a message and he’ll push till that one falls over after which others fall in line.
He did this in enterprise and lawsuits for years. Now we’re seeing it in his presidency, and nowhere greater than greater schooling. Take Columbia College. Trump threatened the college with $400 million in funding cuts in the event that they didn’t conform to a sequence of calls for. Now Columbia is making an attempt to make a take care of him.
So who’s subsequent? And what do Trump’s assaults on greater schooling imply for these establishments over the long run and for the remainder of us?
My colleague David Leonhardt has been writing about universities for many years. For the final 5 years he wrote The Morning newsletter for the Occasions and he now oversees editorials at Occasions Opinion, together with a current one on greater schooling.
Welcome, David.
David Leonhardt: Thanks, Patrick. It’s nice to be right here.
Healy: I need to begin with what you have been pondering as you began to see Trump goal universities. What do you suppose he was actually as much as right here?
Leonhardt: Trump has been fairly clear that he admires authoritarians in different international locations. The best way he talks about Vladimir Putin, the way in which he talks about Xi Jinping in China, the way in which he talks about Viktor Orban in Hungary.
If you happen to take a look at the leaders of nations who’ve taken over international locations that, no less than firstly, have been democracies, or considerably democracies, and moved them towards extra authoritarian types of authorities — that features Hungary, Narendra Modi and India, Recep Erdogan and Turkey and clearly Putin — they’ve seen greater schooling as a menace.
They’ve seen it as one thing that tends to return from intellectuals and are available from the left, and these leaders come from the political proper, they usually’ve seen it as a supply of empirical fact that may threaten these leaders’ makes an attempt to primarily management fact.
And they also’ve shut universities. They’ve put themselves answerable for these universities and Trump hasn’t gone that far but, however the way in which he’s going after greater schooling has loads of echoes of that, and it truly is worrisomely authoritarian.
Healy: It’s so true. The best way that Trump appears at freedom, at independence, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry — these items are risks to authoritarians. Establishments that stay unbiased are threats to an autocratic strategy.
I need to add one thing to your level as a result of I come at this somewhat bit otherwise. I see proof of two issues. I see Trump’s vindictiveness agenda and his domination agenda. He assaults anybody or something that opposes or disrespects him. The Ivy League, liberal professors, pupil protesters, D.E.I. workplaces, attorneys who defend free speech. Even New York Metropolis. And he seeks to dominate anybody or something to accrue extra energy, cash, offers. You realize, extra playing cards in his arms, as he likes to say.
I simply see no proof for a imaginative and prescient of upper schooling. I see no deep desirous about antisemitism. It feels prefer it’s about inflicting most stress and ache within the ways in which you highlighted the way in which that Putin and Orban and these different authoritarians have completed.
Do you suppose it’s about making an instance out of a few of these establishments or do you suppose he really desires to interrupt them down and rebuild them in his picture, or take them in a special course?
Leonhardt: I believe it is perhaps value distinguishing somewhat bit between him, Trump the president, and a few of the individuals round him.
I believe you’re proper that for Trump that is actually extra about destruction than it’s about rebuilding. You’ll be able to see that additionally with Elon Musk and DOGE. There’s a approach wherein you may go in and you may say: We’re going to chop authorities spending, we’re going to construct up U.S.A.I.D., we’re going to take out stuff that feels liberal and we’re going to actually emphasize a smaller, extra reasonable, extra conservative model of U.S.A.I.D.
Healy: A reform agenda could be very fashionable.
Leonhardt: Sure. And even when there could be many individuals who wouldn’t agree with it, that will nonetheless be one option to go about it. That’s not what they’re doing. They are surely destroying.
I believe there’s a model of that with greater schooling as properly. Now that stated, there are individuals round Trump who do have extra of a idea of this. Our colleague Ross Douthat interviewed Christopher Rufo, who has been the main conservative mental taking over liberal intellectuals.
In that interview, which I like to recommend to individuals, Rufo may be very clear. He conveys that what he desires to do is to take this sector of American society that he thinks is overwhelmingly liberal and he desires to shrink it and permit a much less liberal model of it to develop up. Then it’s extra competitors and Christopher Rufo makes use of that time period, “extra competitors.”
So I believe it’s the concept that not all people aspires to go to the College of Michigan or Harvard. Extra individuals aspire to as a substitute go into extra working-class jobs or extra individuals aspire to enter A.I. whereas getting a certificates somewhat than a university diploma.
I imply, it’s inchoate, however I believe that’s roughly what the imaginative and prescient appears like whenever you’re treating it in essentially the most beneficiant phrases. And I’m not saying that some extra conservative model of upper schooling goes to develop out of this, however there are individuals near Trump who do have no less than a partial imaginative and prescient for what they need to see, one thing to exchange what they’re attacking.
Healy: David, as leaders like Trump and as individuals like Rufo acquire extra energy and train extra energy, the opposition issues much more.
You and I are journalists. We’ve watched and we’ve lined Trump through the years and he’s on the assault utilizing these ways just like the domino idea out of the outdated Roy Cohn playbook. One falls then extra fall, and I believe it’s a manifestation of Trump’s marketing campaign line, “I’m your retribution.” Taking purpose on the elites who criticized MAGA voters and known as them deplorables.
I believe we’re on observe at loads of universities and likewise regulation corporations and different establishments that you simply’ve written about the place persons are going to say: Properly, can I make a take care of Trump or can I hold my head down and keep out of the road of fireside? Perhaps not appreciating that this man and the individuals round him like Chris Rufo are on a battle footing.
Do you suppose they notice the seriousness of this? And if I’m being alarmist, push again on me. Or are you seeing indicators of resistance that they’re preventing again?
Leonhardt: So that you requested two questions there, Patrick, and I’ll reply them, I believe, otherwise. Do college leaders notice the seriousness of Trump’s marketing campaign in opposition to them? I really suppose a lot of them do. I can’t communicate for all of them. However I speak to school leaders often and I believe a lot of them perceive that, look, he’s speaking about lowering scientific funding by lowering the quantity that universities get to pay to maintain their labs heated and to maintain the lights on and to pay for eliminating hazardous waste. It’s known as overhead spending. He’s speaking about slicing that for some universities by tens or a whole bunch of thousands and thousands of {dollars}. He’s speaking about rising a tax on their endowment. That would value much more for the richest universities than the scientific funding cuts. So whenever you take a look at a few of the greatest universities, we’re doubtlessly speaking about one thing like a ten % discount, possibly extra, of their annual budgets. That’s even earlier than we get to the focused efforts in opposition to locations like Columbia. I believe a lot of them perceive the seriousness of it.
You additionally requested what they have been doing about it. I believe the reply to that may be very little. They’re type of hoping that what he’s doing goes to move their very own establishment by. They’re anxious they usually don’t precisely know what to do. They’re in a very robust spot, I don’t need to recommend in any other case, however I really do suppose that they may do greater than they’re doing to attempt to push again in opposition to Trump.
Healy: I keep in mind one among my first interviews with Trump in 2015 after one of many Republican major debates. I requested him why, when he began getting criticized onstage, he got here again so fiercely and intensely. I questioned, is that actually going to play properly, put on properly with voters? Do they really need that? And he gave me a line: If I get hit within the face, I have to hit again 10 instances as arduous.
I do discover myself within the context of upper schooling questioning, when universities are doing so comparatively little to withstand, do they perceive that the one option to strike again at Trump, to get his consideration, to place him on discover successfully, is to hit him again even tougher? And I notice I’m not providing options on how to try this right here, however —
Leonhardt: It’s arduous as a result of whenever you take that unique instance, you’re speaking about two candidates on a debate stage who, to some extent, are equal in energy. And so should you and I are at a political debate and I come after you, you possibly can come proper again after me, and to some extent we’re equals.
There’s a large imbalance of energy between Trump and better schooling. Trump controls big quantities of the funding they’re reliant on. And he controls the regulatory state, which may go after them in different methods. Universities don’t have loads of factors of leverage in opposition to Trump. They aren’t establishments that may essentially transfer American swing voters, no less than in a roundabout way.
And so I do suppose universities are proper to attempt to consider this strategically and even cautiously. However at a sure level in addition they need to act.
I believe that essentially the most promising route for universities entails two issues. One is that they do have to battle again somewhat bit and they should speak in regards to the worth of what they do. They should speak about what number of monetary help college students now enroll. I’ve given them a very arduous time about that through the years overlaying greater schooling. They nonetheless don’t do properly sufficient, however they do rather a lot higher than they used to. I additionally suppose universities have to be introspective as a result of a few of what Trump is declaring I really suppose are actual issues, even when his options could be actually damaging. And so I do suppose universities want to determine this mixture of each preventing again, but additionally cleansing up their very own mess.
Healy: It’s such a problem as a result of some school members, college students, individuals on campuses, they’re so hungry for it. We’re seeing simply within the information, professors from Yale to the College of Toronto saying they don’t have religion and belief that their establishment is not only going to battle the nice battle in opposition to Trump, but additionally defend the analysis {dollars} that they should need to do my work.
The concentrating on of universities can appear to be a very slim line of assault in Trump’s bigger undertaking to vary the nation, however these establishments, they accomplish that a lot analysis that all of us rely upon. I’m pondering of mRNA know-how, for instance, that helped result in the Covid vaccine.
How do you consider the function these elite establishments play in American lives?
Leonhardt: American greater schooling is the strongest greater schooling sector on the planet and it’s not significantly shut. You’ll be able to take a look at rankings of the world’s high universities — a lot of that are produced by individuals outdoors the USA — and U.S. universities dominate them. You’ll be able to take a look at who wins Nobel Prizes. Nonetheless, in a typical 12 months, the U.S. wins twice as many Nobel Prizes as No. 2 on the checklist. And I ought to say it’s a mixture of native born People and immigrants who are actually People working at U.S. universities.
If you happen to don’t discover Nobel Prizes and rankings persuasive, take into consideration when elite and rich individuals in different international locations, when they consider the place they need their kids to go to school, they usually need them to go to school in the USA. When individuals get sick they usually’re going through determined medical conditions, the place do they need to get remedy? Individuals who have all these assets abroad, they usually need to come to the USA and go to a U.S. tutorial medical middle. So do many Republican politicians in the USA when their family get sick. Who do they need to deal with them?
We’ve got developed this unimaginable system wherein the federal authorities funds analysis that researchers at universities then do. It results in cures. It results in unimaginable financial advantages. Why is Silicon Valley the place it’s? As a result of it’s subsequent to Stanford College. That’s why it’s there. Why has Boston recovered from deindustrialization so significantly better than so many different cities within the Northeast? It’s as a result of Boston — as you understand, you’re a Bostonian — is that this hub of analysis universities. And so time and again, you see these big advantages that analysis universities deliver and they’re tangible advantages that actually do assist many, many People.
I believe that’s completely central to the case for universities and Trump actually goes after issues which might be going to scale back our potential to seek out therapies for issues that make our family sick and even kill our family.
Healy: It’s so unusual, David. We’ve got leaders like Donald Trump, who went to Wharton himself and who talks about how M.I.T. wants to supply extra air site visitors controllers — that’s the place we have to get the geniuses for air site visitors management. Pete Hegseth went to Princeton, JD Vance went to Yale Regulation. These individuals perceive on some stage the greatness and the significance of those establishments in our lives.
Does Trump need to create extra thought leaders and a management class at these establishments which might be extra within the conservative area? Is he really pondering strategically about this? Or is it simply extra the vindictive agenda, the dominance agenda?
Leonhardt: I believe it’s far more the destroying agenda than it’s the rebuilding agenda. He’s going after what we generally describe as “civil society” in all types of the way. He’s going after regulation corporations and judges. He’s going after universities. He’s going after authorities workers. He’s clearly going after the media. And he’s going after them as a way to monopolize energy. It’s actually essential to see this marketing campaign in opposition to universities as a part of that.
There’s additionally the troublesome dialog about the truth that universities have made actual errors, for my part, over the past couple many years. They actually have — in a approach that I believe is inconsistent with their mission — grow to be a part of Crew Blue on sure points and in sure methods. And never simply the Democratic Celebration, however a comparatively far left a part of the Democratic Celebration.
On all types of points — and never simply elite universities, the California Neighborhood Faculty System has completed a few of this — they’ve actually adopted views that almost all People don’t share. I believe that explains a few of Trump’s marketing campaign in opposition to these universities, a sort of vindictiveness in opposition to what he calls wokeism. I additionally suppose it explains why universities are so weak, as a result of a few of these issues that they’ve completed are very troublesome for them to defend in public. In reality, in the event that they tried to reply to Trump by defending a few of what they’ve completed, they’d make themselves much less well-liked, no more.
Healy: I’ve had conversations not too long ago with fairly liberal, progressive professors at Columbia who’ve informed me how for a few of their progressive colleagues denying Israel’s proper to exist is tantamount to required thought for college kids. It’s like the value of admission. Or about how D.E.I. workplaces multiplied on campus and have been unsympathetic to Jewish college students’ proof of antisemitism.
These are elements of universities that clearly want reform, however are additionally a part of what made them weak to assault and to actual critique. You and I each learn Frank Foer’s recent piece about Columbia in The Atlantic. That headline stated all of it: “Columbia College’s Antisemitism Downside.” Why do you suppose Columbia and different elite universities have struggled to take care of a few of these vulnerabilities that you simply recognized? The caricature for Trump is that left-wing Communist school run the place, however you and I’ve each been to Columbia. This isn’t Moscow on the Hudson. Why is it so arduous for them to get it proper?
Leonhardt: I additionally encourage individuals to learn that article. I believe it’s essential to say, look, there are extremely troublesome debates over Israel and Palestinian rights that folks have to have. The thought of harshly criticizing Israel isn’t antisemitic. However one of many causes I believe it’s essential to learn this text is that it’s possibly the perfect distillation of the proof that what occurred at Columbia and another campuses crossed properly over that line from harsh criticism of Israel and into one thing that actually is antisemitism at instances. Jewish college students at Columbia started hiding seen symbols of their Judaism, stars of David or yarmulkes, as a result of they knew they’d be harassed or in some instances even bodily shoved. These instances are underneath debate about what precisely occurred, however there are actually instances of it.
If you happen to tried to go as much as Columbia over the past 12 months, you principally can’t enter the campus as a result of the protests have been so tumultuous that the campus has primarily shut down. College students barged right into a constructing, they jostled janitors. The janitors stated they did even worse than jostle them. They painted swastikas on partitions. Columbia’s response to this was so extremely weak. What occurred at Columbia actually was antisemitism and the college actually did react extremely weakly to it.
And also you requested why. That’s a very difficult query. I believe that there’s a model of contemporary leftism that sees nearly every thing by means of the prism of race. And so Israel has grow to be significantly essential as a result of, on this model of leftism, it’s a story of white individuals oppressing dark-skinned individuals.
I believe one of many issues that we realized on this final election is that Israel and Gaza was not really a very essential problem to most American voters. And clearly we’re a rustic with horrible issues of racism, however this bigger notion of seeing the entire world by means of issues of race is definitely a notion that rising numbers of Black, Latino and Asian voters reject, which I believe is a part of the explanation that each one of these teams have moved away from the Democratic Celebration and remarkably towards Donald Trump’s Republican Celebration.
Healy: I see it somewhat bit otherwise and I need to do that out with you: I believe that universities like Columbia take a look at that cauldron of difficult, fiery points and that they’re, in some methods right this moment, so led by their normal counsel’s workplace, so led by attorneys who’re advising the boards of trustees or presidents, right here’s what you might want to say. Right here’s what you possibly can’t say. Right here’s how one can enact pupil self-discipline. Right here’s how one can’t. Right here’s how you might want to take care of speech round Israel or Gaza or antisemitism. And I believe Trump is aware of this. He is aware of that asymmetrical energy that you simply have been speaking about earlier, the way in which a president can put a college on the ropes, particularly when it’s coping with such a pinched strategy to management by means of lawyering. He is aware of that he has the higher hand right here.
I discover myself pondering basically that this can be a management drawback, that that is about universities which have for many years been organized and run in sure methods, which have activity forces, which have committees, which have loads of attorneys sort of advising them. And Trump is sort of a bull within the China store, simply smashing previous all of that. I simply surprise how do universities take care of the asymmetry of that?
Leonhardt: I partially agree with that. I suppose I’d say, to me, it’s solely a part of the story. I agree that universities are sometimes actually weak with regards to disciplining college students, with regards to taking daring positions. But when we attempt to determine when have they been weakest in disciplining college students and when have they been prepared to do it? I believe it’s value desirous about their weak point together with the type of leftism that has grow to be dominant on these campuses. These colleges usually have been prepared to self-discipline individuals who did sure issues. They only weren’t prepared to self-discipline college students who intimidated Jewish college students. So to me, sure, I believe a part of that is the type of weak point and the worry they’ve about doing something, however I actually do suppose a part of it’s ideological.
As for what they need to do now, look, by the point Trump comes to your college, it’s in all probability too late. You face actually disagreeable selections. I believe that universities ought to get their very own home so as. I believe they need to acknowledge that they’ve been too weak about disciplining college students. They need to acknowledge that they’ve allowed college students to protest whereas hiding their id. The unique legal guidelines on this nation saying you could’t protest by hiding your id have been meant to limit the Ku Klux Klan. So, there are an entire set of issues that I believe universities can do.
Harvard simply launched a report from its graduating seniors. Solely a 3rd of them felt absolutely snug talking about their sincere views in school. And reasonable and conservative college students have been significantly unlikely to really feel that approach. So I really do suppose though it’ll come off as submitting to Trump — and in some methods will actually be submitting to Trump —- these universities have insurance policies which might be actually arduous for them to defend. I believe they need to repair these, and I believe they need to concurrently make a very forthright case for why a lot of what they do is effective to our nation.
Healy: One in every of my outdated newspaper editors, Marty Baron, appreciated to say, once we had errors in a narrative: If you happen to’re flawed, get proper — as rapidly as doable. I believe you’re proper that universities might fear in regards to the notion that they’re bending the knee to Trump and doing offers with Trump. Which may be a separate matter. But when they know that one thing is flawed internally, take care of it now. Be reformers. I believe there are loads of voters, loads of People who need establishments reformed in some methods.
Leonhardt: There are actual world penalties to the narrowness of college ideology. I do know there are in all probability individuals listening to this who say I’m making a mountain out of a molehill and who cares, the colleges aren’t really brainwashing college students. I really agree with that. I don’t suppose conservatives enter universities conservative and go away liberals. I believe individuals can suppose for themselves.
However I believe Covid is an instance of how the mental narrowness of universities had actual world prices. Universities are the place now we have so a lot of our epidemiologists and our public well being consultants. That’s a kind of fields wherein, whenever you survey the individuals in it, it leans extraordinarily left. Individuals in that subject did a sequence of issues throughout Covid that ended up being fairly damaging and flawed. We nonetheless don’t know the place Covid got here from, however we actually shouldn’t have been making an attempt to sit back debate about whether or not Covid got here from a lab in China. They known as for masks mandates, together with on their very own campuses, but additionally in wider society than it went on for months and months and months.
Worst of all, loads of these epidemiologists argued very strongly for protecting colleges closed for months and months and months on finish. They’re a big a part of the explanation that colleges in Democratic-run areas remained closed for a 12 months or extra in some instances, whereas colleges in locations like Utah and Nebraska and Mississippi have been more likely to open. Looking back, Purple America acquired that call proper, and Blue America acquired it flawed. I’d like to see somewhat bit extra self-reflection from the epidemiologists at these main universities who led us down such a flawed path.
Healy: There may be such energy in America when leaders admit that they have been flawed about one thing, after they take that reflection. Within the time that I’ve been in Occasions Opinion, in all probability the preferred factor that we printed was this package deal by our columnists that had the title “I Was Flawed.” Individuals like others reflecting on and acknowledging issues that they didn’t get proper, partly as a result of it means that these classes realized will put them in higher stead the subsequent time.
I’m grappling with whether or not it’s too late for a few of these establishments to actually keep absolutely out of the road of fireside. David, as you look forward, are we taking a look at a scenario the place like Chris Rufo goes to be sitting round, going by means of the course catalogs of each college, taking a look at titles of lessons or titles of departments and saying, no, no, no, no?
I discover myself questioning what universities can do to rebuild belief, to acknowledge they have been flawed and rebuild credibility. And if there’s actually the likelihood for collective motion right here when you’ve gotten so many establishments which might be these dominoes that aren’t actually working collectively to push again on Trump.
Leonhardt: It’s essential to say that loads of the conservative critics of universities, together with Christopher Rufo, additionally don’t need a absolutely open debate. They need to prohibit debate in lots of instances in order that it’s simply their view of the world. They need to take books out of faculties about L.G.B.T. individuals. That’s actually damaging.
A world wherein Donald Trump’s ideological enforcers are going by means of a course catalog or telling colleges precisely what their admissions insurance policies have to be, somewhat than letting colleges comply with the Supreme Courtroom ruling on it, could be a very damaging world.
Universities are past the purpose the place they will comply with any technique that’s assured to work. A few of that’s their very own fault. A lot of it’s Donald Trump’s doing and fault. However I believe they’ve to consider what the methods are that give them the perfect likelihood of profitable over individuals within the center. What are the perfect methods that they will comply with for making themselves look precious and cheap? I believe that’s a mixture of broadcasting their strengths, acknowledging and fixing their weaknesses, and likewise banding collectively.
I believe it could be actually good if a bunch of universities got here out collectively and stated “Hey, that is what we’re altering and because of this we’re precious.” In politics, there actually is power in numbers. There are not any ensures, however I believe what the colleges have completed to this point has not been almost daring sufficient both by way of acknowledging error or by way of preventing again.
Healy: David, thanks a lot for becoming a member of me.
Leonhardt: Thanks, Patrick.
Ideas? E mail us at theopinions@nytimes.com.
This episode of “The Opinions” was produced by Jillian Weinberger. It was edited by Alison Bruzek and Kaari Pitkin. Mixing by Carole Sabouraud. Authentic music by Sonia Herrero, Carole Sabouraud and Aman Sahota. Truth-checking by Mary Marge Locker. Viewers technique by Shannon Busta and Kristina Samulewski. The director of Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed here are some tips. And right here’s our e mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe the New York Occasions Opinion part on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
