In a current interview that has stirred up social media, Boonie Blue, a lady who defines herself as empowered, tried to justify hypersexualization and promiscuity as instruments of feminine liberation. Her statements, removed from inspiring respect or admiration, reveal the harmful route by which trendy feminism has led many younger ladies: towards ethical confusion, a lack of dignity, and the commodification of their our bodies.
In Blue’s personal phrases:
“Sure, it’s empowering for girls, not only for me, however for different ladies. Most of them—those who aren’t lazy.”
In line with this imaginative and prescient, the “empowered” girl shouldn’t be somebody who research, works arduous, or builds a powerful household. No. On this narrative, empowerment means capitalizing on the sexualization of the feminine physique to generate income, as if that have been the height of ladies’s progress.
Management… or Submission in Disguise?
Blue claims that by collaborating within the hypersexualization of herself by platforms like OnlyFans, she is in management. She says she chooses what to point out, methods to handle her picture, and in her personal phrases:
“I’m earning money with it… I’m in management and, even after I’m not in management, I find it irresistible.”
This contradiction exposes a disturbing fact: this isn’t empowerment—it’s self-deception. When a lady says she loves being uncontrolled, she is admitting her give up to a tradition that strips her of her intrinsic value and reduces her to a visible commodity.
This is identical model of feminism that criticizes the objectification of ladies in media—however celebrates it when it’s labeled as “freedom” or “self-expression.”
Ethical Collapse Disguised as Empowerment
Maybe essentially the most unsettling second of the interview got here when Boonie Blue brazenly spoke of her excessive promiscuity:
“Why do you suppose sleeping with 1,000 males was one thing essential to do? Is there some level you’re attempting to show?”
One would possibly count on this query to be a critique. However no—it’s posed naturally, as if it have been a badge of honor, a revolutionary act, when in actuality it displays a deep identification and values disaster.
Does this actually characterize all ladies? Has the ladies’s rights motion been diminished to promoting one’s physique for clicks, views, and subscriptions?
Selective Feminism: Who Will get to Determine What’s Empowering?
In one more instance of the ethical elitism of the left, Boonie Blue throws a veiled judgment at ladies who don’t comply with her path:
“It’s empowering for those who aren’t lazy.”
So now, a lady who chooses to not hypersexualize herself is “lazy”? The mom elevating youngsters, the younger girl finding out medication, the loyal spouse caring for her residence and group—are these ladies with out ambition?
This rhetoric shouldn’t be solely offensive; it’s damaging for a whole era of younger individuals looking for steering, function fashions, and objective.
What Actual Feminism Used to Imply
True feminism—the sort that fought for the correct to vote, for equal job alternatives, for respect for motherhood and feminine dignity—has been hijacked by a motion that promotes self-destruction disguised as freedom.
Boonie Blue doesn’t characterize all ladies. She represents a loud minority applauded by progressive elites, however rejected by thousands and thousands of moms, daughters, and grandmothers who perceive {that a} girl’s worth shouldn’t be measured by what number of males need her or what number of {dollars} she earns by exhibiting her physique, however by her character, her energy, her knowledge, and her love.
What Form of Society Do We Wish to Construct?
The USA must rebuild its values. It wants to guard ladies’s dignity, not have fun it when it’s degraded. And it wants leaders—not influencers—who educate women that their our bodies are usually not commodities.
In style tradition has glamorized the vulgar. However not every thing that glitters is gold.
