Washington’s Structure doesn’t deal with voters as spectators — it acknowledges them as lawmakers. But legislative management is appearing as if one of many folks’s strongest instruments — the initiative course of — is optionally available.
It isn’t.
Senate Majority Chief Jamie Pedersen and Home Speaker Laurie Jinkins have publicly acknowledged they haven’t any plans to carry hearings on two voter initiatives, IL26-001 and IL26-638, and can ship them on to the November poll. These have been signed by practically half 1,000,000 Washingtonians and licensed beneath state regulation. Underneath Washington’s Structure, they need to be positioned on the entrance of the legislative line. (One initiative is to develop parental rights in public colleges and the opposite would bar transgender pupil athletes from women’ sports activities.)
As a substitute, they’re being pushed apart and disregarded — a public slight to Washingtonians throughout the state.
Article II, Part 1(a) of the Washington Structure is obvious: Initiatives to the Legislature “shall take priority over all different measures” and should be both enacted or rejected — not ignored, and never slow-walked. Not buried beneath lots of of routine coverage payments.
Priority means precedence. It means first.
For greater than a century, Washington courts have acknowledged the initiative energy as a core a part of our system of checks and balances — a manner for residents to behave once they consider elected officers are unresponsive. The state Supreme Court docket has repeatedly stated this energy should be “liberally construed” and protected against legislative interference.
In different phrases, the folks’s lawmaking authority isn’t a courtesy granted by Olympia. It’s a constitutional proper.
This isn’t theoretical. For many years, each initiative despatched to the Legislature obtained hearings. Even in 2024, when lawmakers initially resisted contemplating a slate of initiatives, public stress and constitutional actuality finally pressured motion, and several other have been handed.
What is going on now units a harmful precedent. If legislative leaders can decline to contemplate initiatives as a result of they’re politically inconvenient, then the constitutional assure that such measures “take priority” turns into meaningless.
The folks grow to be a suggestion field as a substitute of a governing associate.
Supporters and opponents of the present initiatives might strongly disagree about their substance. That’s wholesome in a democracy. However the course of that brings these measures ahead belongs to everybody, no matter ideology. Immediately it might be one set of voters being ignored; tomorrow it could possibly be one other.
This isn’t about whether or not lawmakers like a proposal. It’s about whether or not they’ll honor the constitutional position of the residents they symbolize.
When lots of of non-budget payments are receiving hearings, votes and committee consideration, whereas constitutionally protected initiatives are denied even that primary consideration, one thing has gone significantly incorrect. The Legislature can’t decide and select which components of the Structure to comply with primarily based on political consolation or desire.
The initiative course of exists exactly for moments like this — when the general public believes the political class is just too insulated, too cautious, or too aligned with particular pursuits to behave. That isn’t solely why our Structure elevated these measures above odd laws, but in addition why it makes use of obligatory language. Courts have persistently defended the “fourth department” of presidency: the folks themselves. Legislative leaders’ option to ignore this speaks volumes.
Washington’s leaders face a easy alternative. They will comply with the Structure and provides voter initiatives the precedence and consideration the regulation calls for, or they will redefine “take priority” to imply “we’ll get to it if we really feel prefer it.” Evidently, they’ve as soon as once more determined they don’t really feel prefer it; that’s unacceptable.
One of many above selections preserves the stability of energy envisioned by our founders. The opposite erodes it.
The folks of Washington did their half. They gathered signatures. They adopted the regulation. They invoked a constitutional proper. Now it’s time for the Legislature to do its half as nicely.
