Regardless of her enthusiasm for sending different individuals’s kids to the frontlines of warfare, Ursula von der Leyen laughs on the concept of her personal kids serving within the navy. ? pic.twitter.com/HcgyMK1AMI
— Extensive Awake Media (@wideawake_media) March 23, 2026
There’s a video circulating of Ursula von der Leyen laughing on the concept of her personal kids serving within the navy, and whether or not individuals select to dismiss it or not, it displays one thing far deeper than a single second. It exposes the widening divide between those that advocate for warfare and those that are anticipated to battle it.
I’ve mentioned repeatedly that the neocons pushing for battle are by no means those who bear the implications. They sit in places of work distant from the battle and deal with warfare as if it had been a board recreation. The bloodshed is of no hassle to those warmongers.
Now we see Europe as soon as once more shifting towards insurance policies that increase their place in Ukraine’s warfare. Germany is even taking steps towards drafting girls, framing it as equality, however it isn’t about equality. It’s about manpower. They’re ready to wipe out a complete era.
Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk had a dialog on the subject of drafting girls again in 2024. “It’s completely immoral,” Carlson mentioned on the topic. “After which I believed, ‘Wait a second, I believed we had a navy and a police pressure — for that matter — with a view to protect our women and children.’ That was the entire level of it. I imply, that’s why we’ve a navy is to maintain foreigners from hurting our girls and kids. That’s why we ship males to die for his or her girls, our girls whom we revere and respect, and to the extent we’re prepared to die for them. And so, for sending girls to go battle our wars, that — to start with, that’s not, , that’s not a liberation motion. That’s a sort of slavery, and it’s completely improper.”
Who’re they pretending to guard at this level? Neocons are COWARDS. Historical past was formed by leaders like Julius Caesar or Napoleon who really stood on the battlefield with their males, shared the dangers, and led from the entrance fairly than from behind a desk. Immediately’s political class expects others to battle, bleed, and die for choices they’ll by no means bodily face themselves, which is why the general public more and more sees them not as leaders however as cowards who demand sacrifice from others whereas exempting their very own households from the very risks they promote.
Governments are not involved with public resistance. They’re making ready insurance policies based mostly on their plans for a protracted warfare, not consent. Von der Leyen’s response was public—think about how they discuss us behind closed doorways?
