Sky Sports activities has scrapped its new female-focused TikTok channel, Halo, after it confronted a backlash on-line with its posts described as “patronising” and “sexist”.
In a press release posted on social media on Saturday night time, the broadcaster stated it “did not get it proper” and that it could be “stopping all exercise” on the account.
The channel, which was solely introduced on Thursday, was described by the broadcaster as an “inclusive, devoted platform for girls to get pleasure from and discover content material from all sports activities, whereas amplifying feminine voices and views.”
Nonetheless, many on social media criticised the “little sister” account, which talked about “sizzling woman walks” and matcha in its content material.
At its inception, Sky stated Halo’s intention was “to construct a welcoming neighborhood for feminine followers, whether or not informal or dedicated, by enjoyable, trend-led, and relatable content material”.
One put up noticed a clip of Manchester Metropolis gamers Rayan Cherki and Erling Haaland combining for the latter to attain towards Bournemouth, given the caption “How the matcha + sizzling woman stroll combo hits”.
Viewers argued the posts have been “infantilising” and undermined the work executed over the previous few years to place girls’s sport within the highlight.
Amongst these criticising the channel was Emily Timber, 23, who informed BBC Newsbeat that she thought Halo calling themselves the “little sister” of Sky Sports activities was a “actually damaging” factor to say.
“We have spent the final 50 years attempting to return away from the stereotypes round girls’s sport, and attempting to make girls’s sport seen as an entity in itself moderately than simply as an extension of what males can do. We deserve our personal house, one thing that is ours. We do not have to be the ‘little sister’ to anybody,” she stated.
GirlsontheBall, a distinguished platform protecting girls’s soccer, voiced its frustrations saying on X they might not “think about that is what girls sports activities followers need”.
“Have many ideas which I’ll get to when not beneath a mountain of writing however all I can ask is why? The branding (in the future can we please be previous the pink/peach stage?!), the premise, the copy…”
Sports activities fan Millie Jones, 27, informed BBC Newsbeat that she didn’t assume girls wanted a separate house for content material, moderately, she says, they have to be equally represented within the content material Sky Sports activities already put out.
“As a sports activities fan, I’ve consumed generic Sky Sports activities media for the whole lot of the time that I have been into sport. I do not want a pink, glittery sidepiece to the conventional content material,” she stated.
One consumer stated that Sky Sports activities Halo was one of many worst ideas he had ever seen.
“So condescending. Making a dumbed down sports activities channel for girls is unbelievably sexist. Unbelievable that it was authorised and that it is nonetheless dwell,” they stated.
Some social media customers have additionally created spoof posts of the channel’s content material which have been broadly shared.
Whereas the channel was aimed toward girls lots of the sports activities stars featured in its posts have been males.
Andy Gill, head of social media and viewers improvement at Sky Sports activities, wrote on LinkedIn that he “could not be prouder and extra enthusiastic about [Halo’s] launch”, however by Saturday night time the broadcaster was compelled to rethink.
All however two posts have been deleted from the Halo account, one in every of which is a short assertion from Sky which reads: “Our intention for Halo was to create an area alongside our current channel for brand spanking new, younger, feminine followers.
“We have listened. We did not get it proper. Because of this we’re stopping all exercise on this account. We’re studying and stay as dedicated as ever to creating areas the place followers really feel included and impressed.”
The BBC contacted Sky for remark however it had nothing additional so as to add.
Correction 16 November: An earlier model of this story incorrectly referred to at least one put up as having been printed by Halo however it was a mock-up not produced by the channel.
