QUESTION: Concerning Choose Hannah Dugan’s indictment, some are saying her defence is just like that of Donald Trump, and that is all political since she says she has absolute immunity. You’re the unbiased authorized supply. One lawyer pal mentioned, “Ask Armstrong, and you’ll hear the authorized fact.” So what’s up with this?
GP
ANSWER: This county state choose of Wisconsin was correctly indicted for allegedly obstructing the arrest of a Mexican immigrant by federal US authorities. She has claimed that the fees must be dismissed as a result of she’s immune from prosecution for official acts. Her definition of a “authorized act” is that she may kill her partner and declare immunity.
This isn’t even remotely associated to the allegations of Trump commenting on the election as president. That’s throughout the scope of his place. What he’s alleged to have finished was not an official act by any stretch of the creativeness. She is an activist choose who disagrees with federal legislation however has no judicial energy to avoid that legislation. She had no jurisdiction over the ICE challenge, which is in a federal court docket, not an area county court docket. If I had been within the grand jury, I might have indicted her with out query. There isn’t any justification in any respect for her actions, and there’s no declare that that is an official act for which she has immunity.
