Close Menu
    Trending
    • Charlie Kirk’s Enduring Legacy Lives On
    • Brian Cox Accidentally Flashes Film Festival Audience
    • China launches discrimination and dumping probes into US chips ahead of trade talks
    • Rubio due in Israel to discuss war on Gaza after Israeli strike on Qatar | Israel-Palestine conflict News
    • America: We have become puppets
    • Inspired Supporters Say Charlie Kirk’s Legacy Will Live On
    • Lizzo Flaunts Slimmer Figure In Sheer Ensemble At Fashion Show
    • Paramount criticises pledge by entertainers to boycott Israeli film institutions
    Ironside News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • Tech News
    • World Economy
    Ironside News
    Home»Latest News»Pakistan’s ‘war on terror’ approach is dangerous | Opinions
    Latest News

    Pakistan’s ‘war on terror’ approach is dangerous | Opinions

    Ironside NewsBy Ironside NewsMarch 19, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Refusing to see the roots of insurgencies, utilizing ‘terrorism’ labels, and scapegoating neighbours will not be successful methods.

    On March 11, fighters from the Balochistan Liberation Military (BLA) hijacked a Jaffar Specific practice travelling from Quetta to Peshawar. After a 36-hour standoff, the Pakistani safety forces have been capable of kill the BLA operatives and launch a whole bunch of hostages. In keeping with the federal government, not less than eight civilians misplaced their lives throughout the operation.

    Pakistani officers were quick to blame Afghanistan and India for what they referred to as a “terrorist incident”. That is the most recent instance of how the Pakistani authorities more and more deflect accountability and body Pakistan’s relationship with Afghanistan within the language of “battle on terror”.

    Virtually three months earlier than the practice hijacking, Pakistani fighter jets bombarded Afghanistan’s Khost and Paktika provinces, killing not less than 46 individuals, together with ladies and kids. Most of the casualties have been displaced individuals from Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa area.

    Pakistan justified its violation of Afghan sovereignty and worldwide legislation by claiming that it’s focusing on Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) fighters hiding on Afghan territory. Over the previous two years, Islamabad has been accusing Kabul of harbouring “terrorists” who’ve carried out assaults on Pakistani territory.

    This is similar logic the US employed to conduct air raids, kidnappings, focused killings, and so on all through the Muslim world throughout its so-called “battle on terror”. In doing so, the US trampled over all of the conventions the world had endorsed affirming state sovereignty, the excellence between civilians and combatants, proportionate response and the rights of prisoners of battle.

    The US military and intelligence noticed civilians as lively combatants or “collateral harm” that was inevitable when a “high-value goal” was pursued. Entire international locations and civilian populations paid the worth for “terrorist” strikes carried out by armed teams – they usually nonetheless do. That’s as a result of the US could have withdrawn from Afghanistan and Iraq, however the legacy of its practices stays and is instantly embraced by governments within the area. Pakistan’s authorities is one in all them.

    All through the 20-year US occupation of Afghanistan, Pakistan refused to see the Afghan Taliban as “terrorists” and continued sheltering and supporting the group. But immediately, the Pakistani authorities label the TTP and BLA as “terrorist” teams and the Afghan Taliban authorities as sponsors of “terrorism”.

    They refuse to see these native insurgencies as politically motivated rational actors who might be reasoned with or whose grievances ought to be heard.

    How Pakistan chooses to cope with these teams is an inside matter, however there are a couple of classes from the latest American adventurism that should be heeded.

    The US forged a large definition of “terrorism” by which Muslims at dwelling and overseas turned suspect. In Afghanistan, it lumped its enemy al-Qaeda with the Taliban and at occasions Afghan civilians.

    The imprisonment and torture of alleged Taliban members solely fed the fervour of Taliban fighters and led to an escalation in violence. Indiscriminate drone strikes on civilian communities in Afghanistan and Pakistan not solely violated sovereignty, but in addition inspired younger males to hitch the Afghan Taliban and TTP.

    A number of makes an attempt by the Taliban to barter with the US didn’t bear fruit till 2021, when, exhausted by a two-decade occupation and battle, Washington determined to withdraw, principally accepting defeat.

    It’s simple to dismiss actions as “terrorist” and refuse to see any path of reconciliation. However because the American instance exhibits, this strategy doesn’t finish effectively.

    As an alternative of making an attempt to tug the US into one other battle on “terror” – as US media outlet Drop Site has reported – the Pakistani authorities ought to study from the American expertise. They can’t feign ignorance about teams like TTP and BLA; they’re coping with their very own residents, who’ve clear grievances.

    The Pakistani authorities has to listen to the calls for of those teams and discover a strategy to negotiate with them. It has to recognise the struggling of the civilian populations within the areas the place BLA and TTP function. It additionally must put an finish to violating Afghanistan’s sovereignty and scapegoating the Taliban authorities for their very own safety failures beneath the guise of “battle on terror”.

    If the Pakistani navy decides to not study from latest historical past and follows within the footsteps of the US, it’s fairly possible it’s to satisfy its destiny.

    The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleOpinion | Trump’s Public Health Appointees Don’t Believe in a Public
    Next Article Ben & Jerry’s says parent Unilever decided to oust ice cream maker’s CEO
    Ironside News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Latest News

    Rubio due in Israel to discuss war on Gaza after Israeli strike on Qatar | Israel-Palestine conflict News

    September 14, 2025
    Latest News

    Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,298 | Russia-Ukraine war News

    September 14, 2025
    Latest News

    Venezuela condemns US destroyer for hostile occupation of fishing vessel | Border Disputes News

    September 13, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    What if you raised expectations for students? This Seattle school did

    August 23, 2025

    Vice President Vance Meets With Indiana Leaders About Congressional Redistricting

    August 11, 2025

    ‘When I’m Talking, You’re Not Talking’

    March 20, 2025

    RFK Jr. Says HHS Will Disclose Causes of Autism in September

    September 5, 2025

    US vows to keep hitting Houthis until shipping attacks stop

    March 16, 2025
    Categories
    • Entertainment News
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    Most Popular

    Top Doctors Raise Grave Doubts Over Conviction of ‘Killer Nurse’ Lucy Letby

    February 4, 2025

    Trump to announce trade deal with UK on Thursday, reports say | Donald Trump News

    May 8, 2025

    US Senate opens debate on Trump’s controversial spending Bill

    June 29, 2025
    Our Picks

    Charlie Kirk’s Enduring Legacy Lives On

    September 14, 2025

    Brian Cox Accidentally Flashes Film Festival Audience

    September 14, 2025

    China launches discrimination and dumping probes into US chips ahead of trade talks

    September 14, 2025
    Categories
    • Entertainment News
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright Ironsidenews.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.