new video loaded: The President’s Private Spy Chief
transcript
transcript
The President’s Private Spy Chief
From becoming a member of an F.B.I. search of an election heart to allegedly suppressing a whistleblower grievance, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of nationwide intelligence, is eroding the independence of our intelligence neighborhood, argues Instances Opinion’s editor, Kathleen Kingsbury.
-
It’s time to speak about Tulsi Gabbard. President Trump, endlessly a actuality TV star — “You’re fired. Get out of right here.” — has assembled fairly the solid of characters in his second time period. Considered one of them, Tulsi Gabbard, is the director of nationwide intelligence. Gabbard is eroding the credibility of our intelligence businesses in actual time. Final week, Gabbard made an uncommon look in Georgia, becoming a member of F.B.I. brokers as they searched an election heart that President Trump criticized after his defeat within the 2020 election. “Everyone knows that President Trump is obsessed about the truth that he misplaced Georgia and he misplaced the 2020 election.” The following day, Gabbard known as the president — “It was a rigged election. All people now is aware of that they discovered. Individuals will quickly be prosecuted for what they did.” — and obtained him on speakerphone to speak immediately with the brokers who carried out the search — “That’s not the best way our system works.” probably compromising the independence of the entire investigation. “It’s injecting politics into an already very political scenario.” We additionally discovered that investigating the 2020 election has been an enormous a part of Gabbard’s portfolio. Simply what America wants our director of nationwide intelligence to be centered on. “She’s working very laborious and making an attempt to maintain the election secure.” This week it obtained much more regarding when The Wall Road Journal reported {that a} whistleblower filed a grievance in opposition to Gabbard final Might. “Our consumer requested to have this transmitted to Capitol Hill. That’s the regulation. That’s what Tulsi Gabbard ought to have performed.” We’re simply listening to about it now, eight months later. That’s not regular. “The underlying grievance is concerning the D.N.I.’s actions.” And in response to the whistleblower, it’s as a result of Gabbard tried to bury the grievance. However this week, it lastly went to Congress. On Wednesday, the grievance was proven to the eight leaders in Congress who’re briefed on probably the most delicate intelligence info. “It took six months of bipartisan stress.” Gabbard’s crew has stated the whistleblower’s grievance is baseless, however even whether it is, the truth that she might have suppressed it’s unprecedented. Individually, Senator Ron Wyden despatched a letter to the C.I.A. director noting that he has deep issues about C.I.A. actions. Now, one could possibly be referring to the whistleblower grievance or Gabbard’s investigations into elections in the US and Puerto Rico — “What within the hell is D.N.I. doing investigating Puerto Rican voting machines? — or the truth that final 12 months, Gabbard fired a high lawyer within the workplace of the inspector basic and put in one among her personal advisers, which senior Democrats stated violated the regulation. The purpose is, there are an alarming variety of ways in which Gabbard and her colleagues throughout the Trump administration are chipping away on the independence of businesses that take care of delicate, high-stakes info. And that’s extremely harmful for our democracy and for our nationwide safety.
By Kathleen Kingsbury, Lauren Dominguez Chan and Ingrid Holmquist
February 7, 2026