A star in 2025 trying to increase consciousness about important ladies’s points has no finish of worthy targets. She may discuss concerning the hundreds of thousands of girls shedding entry to contraception and other vital health care as a result of the Trump administration has taken a hacksaw to U.S.A.I.D. or talk about the mass layoffs on the early child care program Head Start, which is able to have an effect on poor mothers and their children essentially the most.
As a substitute, some distinguished ladies — those capable of command consideration in our information-saturated world — are going to space for 11 minutes, they usually’re utilizing the associated publicity to lift consciousness about eyelash extensions.
This isn’t an “eat the wealthy” satire, although I don’t assume I may have invented a greater one. Lauren Sánchez, the fiancée of one of many world’s wealthiest males, Jeff Bezos, organized an all-female flight on Blue Origin, her man’s non-public rocket ship firm. Sánchez and the remainder of her crew, together with the pop star Katy Perry, the CBS morning information host Gayle King, the aerospace engineer Aisha Bowe, the civil rights activist and astronaut Amanda Nguyen and the movie producer Kerianne Flynn, appeared on the quilt of Elle journal’s digital version to tout their “historic” achievement.
Whereas they talk about the significance of girls in STEM and the worth of illustration for younger ladies of coloration, they spend a complete lot of time speaking about their “glam.” Essentially the most memorable, embarrassing alternate is between Sánchez and Perry.
ELLE: This would be the first time anyone went to area with their hair and make-up performed.
LS: Who wouldn’t get glam earlier than the flight?!
KP: Area goes to lastly be glam. Let me let you know one thing. If I may take glam up with me, I’d try this. We’re going to put the “ass” in astronaut.
Then later, Sánchez says, “We’re going to have lash extensions flying within the capsule!”
What goes unmentioned by these illustrious ladies is that the Trump administration not too long ago laid off 23 individuals from NASA, including the chief scientist Katherine Calvin, and NASA is closing places of work to adjust to President Trump’s directives on diversity, equity and inclusion. Whereas the Blue Origin group was discussing the gender and racial disparities for astronauts with Elle, they may have additionally talked about how Trump’s assaults on D.E.I. may threaten programs meant to help close gender and racial gaps in STEM fields, or how the administration has decimated science funding.
They definitely remained mum on the truth that Amazon donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund, and that Bezos and Sánchez had prime seats at Trump’s swearing-in. It’s additionally value mentioning that Blue Origin simply gained a federal contract worth over $2 billion.
This morally vacuous area stunt must be one other nail within the coffin of movie star feminism. There was a second, greater than 10 years in the past, when being a loud and proud, self-proclaimed feminist was in vogue among the many wealthy and well-known. Actresses and pop stars have been always asked about their feminism in interviews, and books like “Lean In: Girls, Work, and the Will to Lead,” by former the Fb/Meta govt Sheryl Sandberg, have been mega best-sellers.
I used to be at all times skeptical that this sort of surface-level advocacy would have a significant influence on the typical lady — I wrote a important overview of “Lean In” for Slate in 2013 concerning the limits of the bootstrapping, particular person feminine achievement (asking for raises, not shying away from new alternatives earlier than having children) of the type Sandberg recommends within the ebook. I wrote, “The complete factor provides quick shrift to the large structural boundaries which can be a significant piece of stopping even privileged ladies from reaching their full potential.”
Even with my skepticism, I held out some small glimmer of hope that movie star feminism may rub off not directly on the bigger tradition. After all celebrities wield great energy — our president is one! So I assumed: Maybe if we had extra ladies who have been very public leaders and unashamed of that truth, perhaps the typical individual could be extra snug with the thought of highly effective ladies. And Sandberg — together with different media-friendly businesswomen, like “Girl Boss” Sophia Amoruso, who based Nasty Gal clothes — may have impressed different ladies to make good cash. Whereas authorized change is extremely vital (with out it we nonetheless wouldn’t have entry to credit score, for instance), norm shifts matter, too.
No matter promise trickle-down feminism had has been utterly snuffed out by the truth of celebrity behavior. However when did it begin to curdle? This query occurred to me whereas studying “Careless People,” a brand new memoir-cum-exposé from Sarah Wynn-Williams, a former international public coverage director at Fb. The Sandberg portrayed in its pages and the individual broadly recognized for her public cheerleading on behalf of girls in enterprise couldn’t be extra completely different.
Wynn-Williams describes a decidedly unfeminist ambiance at Fb; within the ebook, she alleges that lodging sexual harassment complaints led to employee retaliation from the corporate and her personal firing. (Meta informed CNN it did a monthlong investigation of Wynn-Williams’s complaints and that the corporate decided her accusations have been “unfounded.”)
However simply as troubling is the best way Fb focused weak teen ladies at a time when Wynn-Williams claims that Sandberg appeared “utterly eliminated” from her function as chief working officer, as a result of she was too centered on her pet tasks outdoors the corporate.
In 2017, Wynn-Williams explains, “a confidential doc is leaked that reveals Fb is providing advertisers the chance to focus on 13-to-17-year-olds throughout its platforms, together with Instagram, throughout moments of psychological vulnerability once they really feel ‘nugatory,’ ‘insecure,’ ‘careworn,’ ‘defeated,’ ‘anxious,’ ‘silly,’ ‘ineffective,’ and ‘like a failure.’ Or goal them once they’re nervous about their our bodies and considering of shedding pounds.” The corporate knew when a teenage woman deleted a selfie, and it might bombard her with magnificence commercials, assuming she deleted it as a result of she felt she regarded ugly.
There have been many whistle-blowers and lawsuits since 2017, accusing Fb and Meta of knowingly inflicting hurt to teenage ladies particularly. It’s not possible to take anybody significantly as a feminist if she reveals a callous disregard for the emotional well being of the following technology of younger ladies. (A spokesperson for Meta told The New York Times that “Careless Individuals” is a “mixture of out-of-date and beforehand reported claims concerning the firm and false accusations about our executives.”)
For movie star feminism to be even slightly efficient, highly effective ladies would communicate up for the powerless, even when it harm their backside line or broken a few of their high-flying relationships. Now, there’s no disgrace in any respect in co-opting essentially the most superficial model of the motion for private achieve.
Finish Notes
-
Self-importance will not be altruism: Listed here are two different important takes on the Blue Origin flight that I loved. One is from the influencer Blakely Thornton, who says “You can’t rebrand oligarchy as feminism” and “You can’t rebrand your self-importance as altruism.” One other is from the actress Olivia Munn, who was guest-hosting on ‘In the present day With Jenna & Associates.’ “What’s the purpose? Is it historic that you simply guys are happening a experience? I feel it’s a bit gluttonous,” Munn said. “Area exploration was to additional our data and to assist mankind. What are they gonna do up there that has made it higher for us down right here?”
-
Pizza … however beans: I’ve a rotating record of weeknight meals that may (really) be made in half-hour and that my youngsters will reliably eat. Lots of them come from Deb Perelman over at Smitten Kitchen. One in every of these meals is pizza beans, however full disclosure: I cheat and use a jar of tomato sauce as a substitute of the crushed tomato/broth scenario within the recipe. Nonetheless, it’s a crowd pleaser, and don’t miss the article Deb wrote for me again in 2020 once I was modifying the Parenting part about family meal planning for real life.
Be happy to drop me a line about something here.
