On the day of Donald Trump’s second inauguration, an air raid was in impact in Odesa for a lot of the afternoon. Individuals went about their enterprise. Road distributors continued promoting espresso. Trams stored operating. At Pryvoz, the mammoth farmers’ (and all the pieces else) market, electrical energy went out for some time, however that appeared to haven’t any impact on the tempo of commerce; if it was gradual, that was as a result of it was a Monday. Within the two years and 11 months since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Odesa has gone by way of levels: months of shock and concern, adopted by one thing akin to denial and, lastly, adaptation.
Odesa is a kind of cities — like, say, New Orleans — possessed of a definite persona, a mythology of itself that fuels a fierce and joyful sort of patriotism. Odesa is rightfully pleased with its sea views, its structure, its meals, its multiculturalism, its entrepreneurship and its libertine spirit, however its singular distinction is the well-turned phrase, the unsparingly hilarious joke.
Hanna Shelest, a army analyst, made a kind of remarks early on within the warfare. As she recalled, not lengthy after Russia invaded, an Italian journalist requested her — in that means that male journalists “ask” feminine specialists they’re interviewing whereas really telling them what to suppose — “You do understand that you’re going to have to present Putin one thing?” Shelest paused and stated, “You might be proper. We’ll give him Lake Como.” It was an ideal means of stating the absurdity of the premise, that Ukraine owed Putin one thing simply because he wished it.
I requested Shelest to look at Trump’s inauguration with me. We used the TV in my resort room. Shelest, who’s 43, and her mother and father, who’re each 65, have been residing in a borrowed condominium since a Russian drone hit their constructing on Nov. 14 of final yr. She had simply completed an on-air interview with a French tv channel when she heard a smooth growth, after which the chandelier in her examine fell to the ground, simply lacking her mom. It took all of them a couple of minutes to appreciate that a number of the rooms of their condominium have been in ruins, and the condominium subsequent door was in flames. Nonetheless, they have been fortunate: The drone didn’t explode. Within the days that adopted, after the fireplace had been put out, Shelest and her mom used a hearth truck’s raise to get into their condominium by way of a window to salvage some garments.
“That was sort of odd,” Shelest stated when Trump completed his speech. “I’m confused by the emphasis on sovereignty. Is anybody threatening the sovereignty of america? It’s significantly odd watching this from Ukraine, the place we are literally combating for our sovereignty. It has a means of diminishing our battle.” She was slightly shocked that Trump didn’t point out Ukraine, although he beforehand promised to finish the Russo-Ukrainian warfare inside 24 hours. One may assume that Trump was referring to Ukraine when he complained that the Biden administration had “given limitless funding to the protection of international borders.” She stated a in all probability unintended impact of not mentioning Ukraine by identify was that Japan and Taiwan, for instance, in addition to army contractors, have been placed on discover. “And Panama!” she added. “What did calm, peaceable Panama do?”
To me, all of this sounded acquainted. Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, spent a few years trafficking in imagined grievances and illusory threats to Russian sovereignty. Because it typically has been in historical past, this language was a prelude to launching his ruthless wars. Even Trump’s language concerning the Panama Canal, which he known as a “silly present that ought to have by no means been made,” was a direct reprise of Putin’s statements on Crimea, which he repeatedly described as having been a present to Ukraine from Nikita Khrushchev within the Fifties. As is his means, Trump is shifting sooner than his position mannequin. No sooner had he launched the concept of wounded sovereignty than he promised that “america will as soon as once more take into account itself a rising nation — one which will increase our wealth, expands our territory.” Totalitarian leaders, leaders who wish to keep in energy eternally, undertake expansionist wars.
This axiom of totalitarianism makes it unlikely that Trump will have the ability to ship on his promise to finish the warfare in Ukraine. Putin wants this warfare.
Putin additionally desires a summit with Trump, which seems to be on observe to occur this yr. A gathering with the U.S. president would sign an finish to the interval of worldwide isolation Russia entered after it invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
A gathering with Trump wouldn’t solely present Russians — and the remainder of the world — that Putin is as soon as once more a reliable voice on the earth; it might additionally give him what he has lengthy demanded: a dialog concerning the destiny of Ukraine that doesn’t embrace Ukraine. Within the week earlier than Trump’s inauguration, some high-level Russian officers made aggressive statements indicating that Ukraine shouldn’t exist in any respect.
For many of the previous three years, the Kremlin has both flat-out refused to enter talks on an finish to the warfare or made calls for for territory that far exceeded what Russia had been capable of occupy. If any talks occur, Shelest stated, Russia shall be not to find a sustainable answer however simply in maximizing its personal place.
However Shelest hopes that Putin will overplay his hand. He’s properly on his means. Final month a Russian oligarch and Putin booster instructed The Monetary Occasions that Russia would merely make a present of reviewing Trump’s peace plan for Ukraine, then reject it. (In response, the Trump adviser Keith Kellogg, showing on Fox Information, mysteriously directed the oligarch to “get again in your field.”) Prior to now, Putin has generally indicated that he has a low opinion of Trump’s intelligence. “He could also be tempted to humiliate Trump, to place him in his place,” Shelest stated.
May that get Trump’s ire up? “Possibly he’ll resolve that he desires to be a victor,” Shelest stated. Possibly he’ll give Ukraine what the Biden administration has held again: sufficient army sources and the liberty to make use of them to actually damage Russia. It’s a hell of a factor to see Trump’s propensity to behave out of spite as your nation’s finest hope.
An hour after Shelest left my resort room, the air raid siren went off once more.
M. Gessen is an Opinion columnist for The Occasions. They gained a George Polk Award for opinion writing in 2024. They’re the writer of “The Future Is Historical past: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia,” which gained the Nationwide E book Award in 2017, and different books.
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed here are some tips. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Observe the New York Occasions Opinion part on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.
