new video loaded: A Conflict of Alternative Does Not Make Us Safer
transcript
transcript
A Conflict of Alternative Does Not Make Us Safer
“The primary mission of a president is to maintain People secure,” says Occasions columnist Nicholas Kristof following america and Israel’s navy strike in opposition to Iran Saturday. “On this case I worry that President Trump, by embarking on a warfare of alternative, has made us much less secure and could also be placing People in danger for months or years to come back.”
-
Look, the primary mission of a president is to maintain People secure. On this case, I worry that President Trump, by embarking on a warfare of alternative —— “The USA navy started main fight operations in Iran.” he as a substitute has made us much less secure and could also be placing People in danger for months or years to come back. “The lives of brave American heroes could also be misplaced, and we might have casualties. That always occurs in warfare.” We’re now at warfare with Iran. President Trump says that the purpose is nothing lower than the overthrow of the ayatollahs. “A vicious group of very exhausting, horrible folks.” We’ll see how issues go and positively I’ve seen firsthand how unpopular the regime is on the bottom, how annoyed extraordinary Iranians are by the corruption, the hypocrisy, the repression and the financial incompetence of the regime. So possibly he’s proper that they may stand up and overthrow the ayatollahs. “After we are completed, take over your authorities. It is going to be yours to take.” However I believe it’s a mistake to make warfare on the premise of best-case situations. We’re unlikely to attain our goals, partially as a result of air wars often don’t truly achieve toppling regimes. In spite of everything, President Biden and President Trump collectively spent $7 billion making an attempt to overthrow the comparatively weak, poorly armed Houthis in Yemen. They usually failed at that. I believe one of many issues we should always have discovered from Iraq and Afghanistan is that there are some wars that you’re compelled to enter of necessity. There are others that you simply undertake as a alternative. However when you may have seen warfare and witnessed the bloodshed, you suppose it must be a really, final resort. And as a substitute, I worry we have now tumbled into this abyss with out pondering by the ramifications. And I’m afraid that right here we’re drifting towards a warfare, as a result of President Trump had seen success in Venezuela and elsewhere and thought he may once more obtain his goals simply. So put that collectively, and what do you may have? You might have a warfare that’s definitely not assured to satisfy its goals of overthrowing the regime. You might have a warfare that creates actual dangers for People. And one the place there was another path of diplomacy that we had not exhausted. And that feels to me a painful echo of what occurred in 2003.
By Nicholas Kristof and Stephanie Shen
February 28, 2026
