COMMENT #1: Marty, they’re beginning to hearken to you. This decision even mentions the Neocons for the primary time.
Sustain the nice combat
PH
COMMENT #2: Marty, Attention-grabbing bipartisan Home decision mentioning the neocons and saying no extra. Your message appears to be getting by means of.
Effectively performed
We will see.
T
REPLY: Eventually, we’re beginning to hear the fitting phrases. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who’s a libertarian-leaning Republican, got here out to introduce a decision in opposition to U.S. army intervention overseas, posted on the social media website X on Monday that he would introduce such a decision on Tuesday. He mentioned:
“This isn’t our warfare. But when it have been, Congress should determine such issues in accordance with our Structure,” Massie mentioned. “I’m introducing a bipartisan Struggle Powers Decision tomorrow to ban our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this decision.”
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) additionally mentioned that he would co-lead the decision with Massie and that the decision could be privileged, which means that this designation circumvents the management thereby forcing a full Home vote.
“No warfare in Iran. It’s time for each member to go on report. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American individuals?” Khanna mentioned in a post on X. “I’m proud to co-lead this bipartisan Struggle Powers Decision with Rep. Massie that’s privileged and should obtain a vote.”
Any member who doesn’t assist this ought to be pushed from workplace as a pawn of the military-complex institution that advantages from wars.
