Within the op-ed “Bill Gates was right: Make climate spending about results” (Nov. 26, Opinion), the writer advocates that environment friendly actions to deal with local weather change ought to be taken by customers. This brings us again to the very profitable public relations marketing campaign led by British Petroleum and different oil corporations, within the early 2000s, that shifted duty for addressing local weather change from these corporations to customers. (BP popularized the phrase “carbon footprint.”)
Sure, it helps if customers use much less power, or use power throughout low consumption hours, however it’s not sufficient to decrease emissions as we have to. Ask Europeans, these practices have been round for years there.
There isn’t a secret: To decrease emissions as we’d like, we should transfer away from fossil fuels and eat clear power as an alternative. At present, it takes years to ship permits for brand spanking new clear power websites or new electrical transmission traces. Our legislators have to make it a lot sooner to develop these clear power assets, whereas preserving the environment and neighborhood enter.
Cease placing the duty of fixing local weather change on customers. As a substitute, depart fossil fuels within the floor and provides us low-cost and plentiful clear power.
Martine Smets, Redmond
