Seattle and Boeing had been collectively for many years till Chicago got here alongside. However after the corporate moved its headquarters from a cloudy metropolis to a windy one, it struggled.
Was it us? The deep-dish pizza and Italian beef? The continued wait for an additional Tremendous Bowl title?
As this iconic aerospace big tries to regain altitude after one more turbulent stretch, it’s honest to ask if its transfer to Chicago in 2001 put it on the unsuitable course altogether.
When then-Mayor Richard M. Daley introduced that town had received a bidding contest for Boeing’s headquarters, Tribune editorial web page joined within the celebration. The corporate bought over $60 million in public incentives for shifting its boardroom to the Loop. Chicago bought bragging rights.
The transfer made sense to us on the time. Chicago gave Boeing’s management group the handy, centralized transportation hub they had been lacking within the Pacific Northwest. Settling in a extra international metropolis with a financially savvy workforce was extensively thought of a plus as nicely. Transferring out of Seattle additionally put virtually 2,000 miles between the corporate’s high brass and its restive unions, which could have been one of many largest points of interest from the corner-office perspective.
Because it turned out, although, the transfer appears to have undermined an engineering-friendly tradition targeted on design, security and high quality. On reflection, separating from the important mass of aerospace consultants in Seattle remoted the corporate’s leaders from the center of their enterprise.
Other than the transfer to Chicago, the opposite “X issue” in that transformation was Boeing’s 1997 acquisition of McDonnell Douglas, an organization higher recognized for monetary engineering than the aerospace sort. Its priorities had been quarterly income and returning cash to Wall Road shareholders — priorities Boeing embraced after the deal closed, appointing a string of chief govt officers who collected large paychecks however reduce corners in making planes.
One consequence of this alteration was the choice to improve a preferred passenger jet as a substitute of designing a brand new one with all the newest advances, because the perfectionists at old-school Boeing little doubt would have most popular. Extending the lifetime of its workhorse 737s helped Boeing’s backside line within the quick run. Over time, that method opened the corporate to critical issues, together with the infamous 737 MAX crashes.
In October 2018, this newly modified model of the previous 737 jetliner crashed close to Indonesia. 5 months later, one other new 737 MAX crashed in Ethiopia. Boeing had reconfigured the MAX mannequin with greater engines that affected its aerodynamics, and federal regulators had given the corporate an excessive amount of management over certifying the brand new design. A defective flight-control system compelled down the 2 planes regardless of their pilots’ determined efforts to maintain them aloft, killing a mixed 346 aboard.
As an alternative of taking duty, the corporate reportedly tried guilty the overseas airways and resisted grounding its MAX fleet within the curiosity of security. Then-CEO Dennis Muilenburg spouted insincere baloney about security being a core worth, till he was lastly ousted by a board that paid him off with a $62 million exit bundle.
Within the waning days of the primary administration of President Donald Trump, Boeing reached a settlement with the Justice Division that protected it from prosecution over the MAX crashes. Shortly after, in 2022, the corporate moved from Chicago to Arlington, Va., nearer to its No. 1 buyer: Uncle Sam.
Final yr introduced one other surprising security gaffe, when a door panel blew off in midair from a 737 MAX 9 operated by Alaska Airways. Just a few months later, federal prosecutors decided that Boeing had violated its deferred prosecution deal by failing to implement a compliance and ethics program.
In response, Boeing agreed to plead responsible to prison fraud, however a federal choose in Texas rejected the plea deal as a result of it included variety targets. Now, with Trump again in energy, Boeing seems prone to obtain a lighter settlement that avoids a prison plea. Throughout a current Center East journey, Trump additionally publicly promoted Boeing jets — a reminder of the corporate’s political clout and shut ties to its largest buyer: the U.S. authorities.
Cozying as much as a pro-defense administration could also be giving Boeing’s inventory a lift, nevertheless it received’t restore public belief or forestall future failures.
Boeing not too long ago printed the unhappy outcomes of an all-employee survey, its first in years. Most Boeing staff stated they lack religion in senior management, and barely 1 / 4 suggest the corporate as a very good place to work. That’s a giant comedown from the previous days.
Nonetheless, Boeing inventory has bounced again strongly this yr and its newish CEO, Kelly Ortberg, says he’s placing the corporate’s issues behind it. Earlier this month, Ortberg informed Wall Road that he’s introducing “new values and behaviors to your complete group,” vowing to “seize the second to make the required modifications inside the firm.”
Ortberg additionally reportedly purchased a home in Seattle final yr, which we take into account a optimistic step.
If Boeing was going to maneuver the headquarters wherever from Chicago, and if it was critical about rebuilding its tradition, it most likely ought to have moved again to Seattle. Nonetheless, its time right here left a optimistic mark: Boeing supported civic establishments, employed native expertise and helped elevate Chicago’s stature as a middle for international enterprise.
©2025 Chicago Tribune. Go to at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
