Practically eight a long time after the institution of Israel, the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state stays the defining query of the Arab-Israeli battle. Wars have been fought, peace treaties signed and diplomatic initiatives launched, but this central strategic problem stays unresolved.
At this time, Saudi Arabia is on the forefront of the efforts to determine a Palestinian state and ship a long-lasting peace association with Israel. Its dedication to the problem is made clear by its choice to cosponsor the creation of the International Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Resolution in 2024, which is at the moment assembly in Rome.
King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman are following within the footsteps of successive Saudi monarchs. For greater than half a century, the dominion has maintained a remarkably constant place. The query has by no means been whether or not peace with Israel is feasible, however whether or not the political situations required to make such a peace complete, professional and irreversible had been current.
Inside that framework, recognition of Israel and the institution of a sovereign Palestinian state are parallel parts of a single settlement. Neither is meant to precede the opposite.
That doctrine originated below King Faisal, who made Palestinian self-determination a central pillar of Saudi nationwide safety coverage. His successors preserved the precept whereas adapting its diplomatic expression to altering regional realities. The target remained fixed even because the diplomatic atmosphere advanced.
The Fahd Plan of 1981 – named after King Fahd – translated that doctrine into a proper peace proposal calling for Israeli withdrawal from occupied Arab territories and recognition of Palestinian nationwide rights. 20 years later, the Crown Prince and later King Abdullah expanded the identical strategic logic via the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. Israel was provided complete peace and regular relations with the Arab world in return for withdrawal from the territories occupied in 1967 and the institution of an unbiased Palestinian state.
The present Saudi management subsequently inherits a longtime strategic doctrine moderately than an unresolved coverage debate. Their accountability is to find out whether or not at present’s diplomatic atmosphere can lastly fulfill situations which have remained essentially unchanged for many years.
That continuity additionally displays a broader query of state legitimacy. For the Saudi monarchy, assist for Palestinian statehood has by no means been solely a matter of overseas coverage. It has turn into one of many enduring pillars of the dominion’s political and non secular legitimacy, rooted within the monarch’s function as Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and bolstered by the dominion’s longstanding place inside each the Arab and Islamic worlds.
The importance of that continuity grew to become clearer after the Abraham Accords of 2020. By establishing diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, later joined by Morocco and Sudan, the accords demonstrated that Arab-Israeli normalisation may advance with out progress on Palestinian statehood. They reshaped regional diplomacy, however they neither resolved the Palestinian query nor accomplished the broader peace course of.
Successive US administrations have regarded Saudi participation because the decisive lacking factor. The Abraham Accords may broaden with out Riyadh, however they may not purchase their full strategic significance with out the dominion’s participation.
The Trump administration has as soon as once more positioned Saudi-Israeli normalisation on the centre of its regional diplomacy. However this diplomatic push needs to be evaluated within the bigger post-October 7 context.
The warfare in Gaza created a completely new diplomatic atmosphere. The following ceasefire initiative and the institution of the Board of Peace launched a framework supposed to finish the battle, stabilise the territory and start reconstruction. Their significance lies not in changing a political settlement, however in creating situations below which one would possibly turn into attainable.
For the dominion, nonetheless, the important political requirement stays unchanged: the precise and irreversible institution of a sovereign Palestinian state.
That place rests upon mutually reinforcing political, spiritual and financial foundations. The monarch governs not solely as head of state but in addition as Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, a accountability carrying spiritual authority all through the Islamic world. Any choice regarding recognition of Israel would subsequently require each political approval and broad spiritual legitimacy. Such legitimacy couldn’t credibly relaxation upon guarantees of future negotiations. It might require the institution of a sovereign Palestinian state.
The dominion’s wider affect reinforces that place. It’s by far the Arab world’s largest economic system, representing about one-third of whole Arab financial output. The dominion is the one regional member of the G20, one of many world’s main power superpowers and the world’s main crude oil exporter. Additionally it is the Center East’s principal financial engine. Mixed with its spiritual standing, these components give Saudi choices penalties extending far past bilateral diplomacy.
The implications would attain nicely past the dominion itself. A number of main Arab states, together with Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Algeria, haven’t recognised Israel. Their choices are sovereign, however a Saudi-Israeli settlement based upon Palestinian statehood would however remodel the political atmosphere by which these choices are made.
Lebanon illustrates the purpose. Washington is encouraging Beirut to maneuver in direction of formal relations with Israel as a part of a broader effort to stabilise the Israeli-Lebanese frontier. The home political value of such a choice, nonetheless, would look essentially totally different after a Saudi-backed settlement based mostly upon Palestinian statehood than earlier than one.
The identical logic extends throughout the broader Muslim world. Main influential nations corresponding to Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Malaysia have withheld recognition of Israel as a result of the Palestinian query stays unresolved. A settlement accepted by the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and accompanied by the institution of a Palestinian state would compel these governments to comply with. It might take away the principal political and non secular obstacles to reconsidering their positions.
That is what in the end distinguishes Saudi Arabia from the sooner Abraham Accords. Saudi Arabia’s participation can be totally different in sort, not merely in scale, carrying political, financial and non secular significance throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds.
Whether or not the present diplomatic course of can in the end attain that time stays unsure. Israel, the Palestinians, america, the European Union and sure regional governments all have indispensable roles to play. The ultimate Saudi choice, nonetheless, rests with King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Inside the strategic framework they’ve inherited, Palestinian statehood and recognition of Israel are usually not sequential steps however parallel obligations. Neither can purchase lasting legitimacy with out the opposite.
The views expressed on this article are the creator’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
