Europe slowly awakens to its entry into US-China wars

Welcome again. De-risking moderately than decoupling. This neat phrase to explain the EU’s manner of coping with China was first coined by Ursula von der Leyen in early 2023 earlier than turning into official EU coverage a number of months later. The European fee president often recites it. However the formulation is trying a little bit threadbare. There was too little de-risking by way of commerce and funding and now European governments and corporations are beneath stress to decouple from each China and the US.

I’m at ben.hall@ft.com.

Dutch settlement

This week, the Netherlands waded into the battle between the US and China for supremacy in semiconductor know-how. The Dutch authorities seized management of Nexperia, a maker of primary chips for vehicles, client electronics and industrial purposes, from its Chinese language proprietor and chief government Zhang Xuezheng.

It was a drastic and dangerous transfer.

“Because the second-largest EU investor in China and buying and selling nation that positions itself because the gateway to Europe, secure Sino-Dutch relations are key to the Netherlands,” Xiaoxue Martin, Tobias Koster and Raoul Bunskoek, researchers on the Dutch overseas coverage think-tank The Clingendael Institute, wrote in a report earlier this yr. “Thus, the Netherlands has been and can proceed to be strongly affected by US-China competitors. With its open economic system, the Netherlands is susceptible to international financial fragmentation and protectionism.”

Dwelling to ASML, the world’s main maker of chip manufacturing gear, the Netherlands isn’t any stranger to US-China tensions. The Hague has complied with US curbs on exports of ASML’s most superior machines to China with out, up to now, incurring the wrath of Beijing. 

ASML is a way more necessary piece within the chip wars than Nexperia, a maker of specialized however low-margin semiconductors. However utilizing an emergency manufacturing regulation to take management of an organization whose sale to a consortium of Chinese language buyers was authorised by the federal government in 2017 was nonetheless a unprecedented step.

The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU described it as a “trendy act of financial banditry”.

Clawback

The Nexperia seizure suits into what Reva Goujon and Juliana Bouchaud of the consultancy Rhodium Group describe in a report as Washington’s “unstated mission to claw again strategic property from China”. 

Unwinding dependencies on Chinese language-origin or Chinese language-controlled important applied sciences and infrastructure via tariffs, bans or organising new manufacturing strains could be tough and gradual, they write. So making it not possible on nationwide safety grounds for a strategic asset to stay in Chinese language fingers presents a “swifter path”.

The Hague has denied performing beneath instruction from the US. In a letter to parliament, economic system minister Vincent Karremans stated he intervened as a result of the actions of Zhang threatened the “preservation of essential technological information, in addition to manufacturing and improvement capacities within the Netherlands and Europe”.

The actions “embody, amongst different issues, the improper switch of manufacturing capability, monetary sources, and mental property rights to a overseas entity owned by the CEO and never affiliated with Nexperia”, Karremans wrote.

American stress

The Dutch court docket decision permitting the federal government to take management of Nexperia gives extra particulars of those claims. Nevertheless it additionally exhibits The Hague was acting under pressure from the US. The US in December positioned Zhang’s firm Wingtech on its “entity” listing, subjecting it to export controls. And, because the Dutch authorities and Zhang argued over steps to ringfence the chipmaker’s European operations, the US advised The Hague a rule change would prolong the blacklisting to Nexperia too. When that rule got here into impact on September 30, the Dutch took over the reins of the corporate.

Beijing has hit again by banning the exports of a few of Nexperia’s merchandise which can be assembled in China. This, says Goujon, will solely encourage different producers to diversify their packaging operations away from China. So the decoupling is accelerating. 

Additionally it is a reminder that within the advanced enterprise of semiconductors, simply since you manufacture chips in Europe doesn’t essentially make you much less depending on China for different steps, like meeting. It’s one purpose to query the EU’s ambition beneath its chips Act to supply 20 per cent of the world’s chips by 2030. One other is that the EU is manner off hitting that focus on, with giant manufacturing tasks in Europe stalled or abandoned.

The US has weaponised semiconductor know-how within the race with China for technological and navy supremacy; China in the meantime is exploiting its dominance in important uncooked supplies.

Uncommon earths weaponised

Because the Nexperia case was coming to a head, China unveiled sweeping curbs on exports of uncommon earths, together with new guidelines akin to these utilized by Washington to dam chip know-how exports to China from third international locations.

Western corporations have warned the uncommon earths restrictions would result in damaged provide chains, greater costs and delays to manufacturing, with the auto and defence sectors notably uncovered. Partial curbs launched by China already trigger main disruption for European producers.

Europe is arguably extra susceptible than the US due to its massive bets on electrical automobiles and wind generators, which require a variety of uncommon earth parts.

The EU’s important uncooked supplies act, which got here into pressure final yr, units the fitting goal of diversifying provides. However progress has been gradual. A €1bn particular German fund for investing in important minerals was paused. In response to Rebecca Arcesati and Jacob Gunter of the Berlin-based Mercator Institute for China Research, the EU must be extra decisive in drastically decreasing its uncommon earth dependencies, utilizing subsidies, rules and performing as purchaser of final resort to encourage new sources of manufacturing.

Inflection level

Beijing’s uncommon earths offensive comes as European officers are reflecting on a harder method to China. Brussels sees no critical Chinese language effort to cut back its industrial overcapacities flooding European markets. The EU’s contentious tariffs on Chinese language electrical car imports have made barely a dent in gross sales, whereas Beijing has hit again at brandy, pork and dairy imports from the bloc.

The “painful of episode” of EV tariffs has “uncovered the failings” in Europe’s commerce defences, says Noah Barkin on this note for the German Marshall Fund.

“In a world the place China and the US are shifting quick and hitting exhausting, the EU has been too gradual, too timid, and too wedded to a rulebook the others have torn up.”

On a visit to Beijing in July von der Leyen said the EU-China relationship was at an “inflection level”. Restrictions on metal imports, native content material guidelines for public procurement, technology-sharing necessities for brand new Chinese language funding tasks within the EU, and a brand new financial safety technique are all doable instruments to offer Europe leverage. The query is whether or not EU capitals are prepared to make use of them.

Extra on this matter

Misha Glenny on why Europe stands to be the biggest loser from China’s rare earth restrictions

Decide of the week

How Vladimir Putin’s history rant in Alaska nudged Donald Trump closer to Ukraine (for now) by Max Seddon, Henry Foy, Christopher Miller and Amy Mackinnon