«And we’re rewarding girls for ending their pregnancies, after which they name the person irresponsible. So if the daddy doesn’t need the infant, by legislation he’s pressured to be chargeable for the kid for 18 years. They make him pay baby help, throw him in jail, take his license—all the things—if he doesn’t need the infant.
But when the mom doesn’t need the infant, she will be able to terminate the being pregnant and get a pat on the again. They usually name the daddy the irresponsible one. However you don’t need it—you’re the irresponsible one, mother, not the dad. You’re the one who stopped the heartbeat. You stopped the guts. You’re the irresponsible one—not the person, not the daddy.
And on the identical time, they need equal rights. Properly, if a girl can abort a child when she doesn’t need it, then a person must also be allowed to stroll away if he doesn’t need it—he ought to be capable of abandon the infant if he doesn’t need it.
After which we may see simply how ridiculous all of this actually sounds.»
