FBI Assistant Particular Agent in Cost Elvis Chan, one of many central figures within the federal authorities’s censorship of conservative voices in the course of the 2020 presidential election, has reportedly been positioned on terminal go away.
The event was first reported by unbiased journalist Breanna Morello.
Chan, who served because the FBI’s key liaison between the Overseas Affect Activity Power (FITF) and Large Tech corporations like Twitter, Fb, and Google, was instrumental in a government-led censorship marketing campaign to silence conservative voices and suppress damaging details about Hunter Biden within the lead-up to the election.
Morello, citing sources conversant in Chan’s state of affairs, stories that the longtime San Francisco-based agent has not accessed any of his authorities gadgets for over a month.
Chan nonetheless lists himself because the Assistant Particular Agent in Cost on his LinkedIn web page, which incorporates most well-liked pronouns — “he/him.”
EXCLUSIVE
FBI Assistant Particular Agent in Cost Elvis Chan has been positioned on “terminal go away” and has not accessed his company gadgets for over a month, sources affirm.
Chan served as the principle censorship liaison between the FBI’s Overseas Affect Activity Power and social… pic.twitter.com/2no8aktzf2
— Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) May 1, 2025
The Home Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit in opposition to FBI Assistant Particular Agent in Cost Elvis Chan final yr for refusing to adjust to a congressional subpoena tied to the 2020 election censorship scandal.
The lawsuit, filed within the U.S. District Courtroom for the District of Columbia, lays out damning allegations: that Chan, appearing because the FBI’s liaison with Large Tech platforms like Fb and Twitter, performed a central function within the federal authorities’s backdoor scheme to censor Individuals on-line earlier than the 2020 presidential election.
Regardless of being subpoenaed by Congress to testify, Chan—beneath orders from Biden’s Division of Justice—refused to seem. Why? As a result of Congress wouldn’t permit DOJ attorneys to sit down in and monitor the interview. Sure, the DOJ needs to babysit its brokers throughout congressional investigations, undermining the Home’s constitutional oversight authority.
In accordance with the grievance, Chan was a “pivotal determine” passing info from the FBI to social media corporations within the months main as much as the election—info that always led to the silencing of viewpoints inconvenient to the ruling regime.
In accordance with Morello, Chan additionally testified within the landmark case Missouri v. Biden—a case by which I, Jim Hoft, am a plaintiff—the place he conveniently claimed to have “no inside data” of the FBI’s function in pressuring tech corporations to censor the explosive Hunter Biden laptop computer story.
The landmark case — Missouri v. Biden — facilities on explosive proof exhibiting the Biden administration’s coordinated marketing campaign to strain Large Tech platforms into censoring dissenting voices.
I, Jim Hoft, was singled out within the ruling for my aggressive reporting on election integrity, COVID-19, and authorities overreach.
The court docket famous that Gateway Pundit was deplatformed from Twitter in a collection of suspensions all through January and February 2021, culminating in a everlasting ban after publishing surveillance footage from Detroit on Election Evening 2020. The footage confirmed suspicious supply vans arriving at a vote-counting middle within the early hours.
The report additionally documented that YouTube eliminated Gateway Pundit content material associated to voter integrity and that Fb repeatedly censored its posts about COVID-19 and the 2020 election, utilizing warning labels and algorithmic throttling to suppress attain.
“The Gateway Pundit’s Twitter account beforehand had over 400,000 followers,” the court docket ruling states. “Fb had over 650,000, Instagram over 200,000, and YouTube over 98,000.”
The court docket discovered that the Biden administration, in coordination with federal businesses and social media giants, repeatedly suppressed views associated to:
- The Hunter Biden laptop computer scandal
- COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccine skepticism
- Masks mandates
- The 2020 election’s integrity
- Parody content material focusing on the administration
I used to be joined within the lawsuit by medical specialists like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, and Dr. Aaron Kheriaty — all of whom confronted comparable censorship for expressing dissent from federal COVID insurance policies.
The Gateway Pundit has reached out to the FBI for remark.
