Jost’s emailed reply was succinct:
He’s clearly essentially the most impulsive and unpredictable U.S. president of our lifetimes, so I feel it’s inconceivable to say. However primarily based on the primary 100 days of this presidency, I might say extraordinarily harmful to any and all democratic establishments and proponents.
Trump, Jost continued,
completely exemplifies all 9 traits of the authoritarian persona syndrome:
(a) aggression towards those that deviate from established norms, (b) submission to idealized ethical authorities, (c) uncritical acceptance of standard values, (d) psychological rigidity and a proclivity to have interaction in stereotypical pondering, (e) a preoccupation with toughness and energy, (f) exaggerated sexual issues, (g) a reluctance to have interaction in introspection, (h) a bent to undertaking undesirable traits onto others and (i) destructiveness and cynicism about human nature.
Steven Pinker, a psychologist at Harvard who has been on the forefront within the college’s confrontation with the Trump administration, identified that
thus far, Trump has reacted with vengeance, threatening additional analysis cuts in addition to rescinding Harvard’s tax-free standing, in response to Harvard’s lawsuit, even after his administration admitted that the record of calls for had been despatched in error. That is certainly governance by revenge reasonably than justice.
Bullies and road toughs, Pinker continued,
assume properly of themselves not in proportion to their accomplishments however out of a congenital sense of entitlement. When actuality intrudes, because it inevitably will, they deal with the unhealthy information as a private affront and its bearer, who’s endangering their fragile repute, as a malicious slanderer.
And the trio of signs at narcissism’s core — grandiosity, want for admiration and lack of empathy — matches political tyrants to a T. It’s most blatant of their vainglorious monuments, hagiographic iconography and obsequious mass rallies.
Some of the threatening traits of such leaders, Pinker wrote, is that “their lack of empathy imposes no brake on the punishment they mete out to actual or imagined opponents.”
There’s “a giant distinction between basic tyrants and Trump,” in accordance with Pinker:
It’s that his thirst for dominance and revenge usually loses out to his mercurial nature and brief consideration span. We noticed this within the border wall, tariffs and different stop-and-start insurance policies.
He delights in chaos as a lot as in revenge. This implies he might lose curiosity in certainly one of his vendettas and transfer on to the following one. Additionally, like road bullies, he thrives on bluff and bluster and infrequently has a glass jaw when the goal is overwhelming. We noticed this in the truth that he did peacefully vacate the White Home in 2021 regardless of claiming that the election had been stolen.
There’s nonetheless a bigger query. If, within the face of adversity, Trump and his allies try to overturn democracy, what are their possibilities? I requested Herbert Kitschelt, a professor of worldwide relations at Duke and the 2025 recipient of the celebrated Johan Skytte Prize in political science, that query, and he supplied a nuanced reply by e-mail: “No scientific, evidence-based investigation can at present present a factually grounded prognosis” on “whether or not and the way Trump and the Christian evangelical-nationalist-Southern wing of the Republican Celebration would possibly break the democratic Structure of the USA,” he wrote.
As a substitute, Kitschelt argued, it’s attainable to “define the forces that will impinge on whether or not this course of will happen or not.”
Kitschelt then specified the 4 components working in favor of the institution of “an authoritarian coalition in the USA”:
U.S. technological innovativeness and productiveness positive factors — extra so than in different superior capitalist international locations — have generated anxiousness amongst many occupational teams.
The U.S. has a weak welfare state — when it comes to pensions, well being care, unemployment insurance coverage, assist to households with kids, public training — when in comparison with nearly some other superior capitalist nation.
America is essentially the most inegalitarian superior Western nation when it comes to earnings and wealth. That induces wealthy individuals to advertise politicians who distract the economically worse-off from questions of financial distribution and focus their consideration on problems with political governance, tradition battle, racial and ethnic hierarchies and nationalist claims to international supremacy.
Not like some other Western democracy, America has a deeply anti-democratic, illiberal, intolerant spiritual strand.
Kitschelt went on to explain circumstances in the USA that “are adversarial to the victory of an authoritarian coalition” and are, in distinction, favorable to democracy:
America’s civil society: If it awakens from its present shock and slumber, indicators of that are already rising, it’s possible that it’ll develop into a robust drive to uphold democracy.
Most significantly: American capitalism, giant segments of the U.S. enterprise class, whether or not in finance, I.T. and A.I., U.S. producers in international manufacturing chains (autos, aerospace, pharma, and so on.) and U.S. tradition industries are averse to a MAGA & Tea Celebration authoritarian coalition. Populism undercuts property rights and the rule of legislation, rendering it inconceivable to make rational, profit-generating, long-term enterprise investments.
A extreme financial disaster, which Kitschelt believes is possible, given present developments, would sharply undermine Republican prospects within the 2026 congressional elections, which could immediate Trump and his allies to “notice that they can’t win a free and truthful election and really would possibly face a defeat within the midterms extreme sufficient to precipitate the impeachment of each president and vice chairman.”
The query then turns into, in Kitschelt’s view,
Will evangelical-nationalist clero-fascism — with different MAGA and Tea Celebration currents in tow — be able to changing America into an electoral autocracy quicker than U.S. civil society and enormous elements of the enterprise sector will be capable of mobilize a protection of American democracy and to stiffen the backbone of the U.S. judiciary to protect American establishments?
The Occasions is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed below are some tips. And right here’s our e-mail: letters@nytimes.com.
Comply with the New York Occasions Opinion part on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
